Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40182508›Full record

ArticleACS ES&T air2025

Shifting the Conversation on Wildland Fire Smoke Exposures: More Smoke Within and Across Years Requires a New Approach to Inform Public Health Action.

Jason D Sacks, Christopher T Migliaccio, Colleen E Reid, Luke Montrose

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS ES&T air, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Burning issues: trends in newspaper coverage of wildfire events and health.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Long-term exposure to wildfire smoke and mortality: Heterogeneous effects by exposure metric and across subpopulations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jason D SacksCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 27709, United States.
Christopher T MigliaccioCenter for Environmental Health Sciences, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, 59812, United States.
Colleen E ReidGeography Department and Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, 80309, United States.
Luke MontroseDepartment of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523, United States.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the increase in acres burned from wildfire over the last few decades, wildfire smoke is an increasing global public health threat. To date, wildfire smoke research, risk communication, and public health action has focused on short-term (or daily) smoke exposures. However, the patterns of wildfire smoke exposure are transitioning to include longer duration and repeated exposures occurring within and across years. Epidemiologic and experimental studies represent important lines of evidence that have informed risk communication and public health actions for short-term smoke exposures; however, they have yet to provide the science needed to refine public health approaches to include other dynamic exposure durations such as repeated, episodic, or cumulative. This commentary provides an overview of methodological approaches used and recent findings from epidemiologic and experimental studies that examined longer duration, repeated smoke exposures. Based on the current science, we recommend that future epidemiologic and experimental studies of wildfire smoke examine multiple exposure metrics to capture the duration, frequency, and intensity of exposures. Such studies would improve the science produced to best support the needs of the public as we strive to further protect public health in a world projected to have more smoke.

Indexed as

exposurefine particulate matter (PM2.5)public healthsmokewildland fire

Identifiers

PMID40182508
PMCPMC11964113

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.