SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2025
Association between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism and cerebral small vessel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase, MTHFR) cytosine (C)677thymine (T) polymorphism and cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD), addressing potential sources of heterogeneity and publication bias. Methods: An extensive search of databases, including PubMed, the Excerpta Medical Database, and The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, was conducted to identify studies assessing the prevalence of the MTHFR C677T variant associated with CSVD subtypes in humans. Random or fixed effects models were used to accommodate heterogeneity across the study results. Odds ratios (ORs) and weighted mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used for pooled analyses of the relationships between the MTHFR C677T variant associated and CSVD subtypes. Subgroup analyses and assessments of publication bias were performed using Stata software. Results: Nineteen studies involving 12,441 participants were included. Significant associations were observed across all genetic models: recessive (OR = 1.33; 95%CI = 1.16, 1.52), dominant (OR = 1.25; 95%CI = 1.14, 1.37), allelic (OR = 1.24; 95%CI = 1.14, 1.35), TT vs. CC (OR = 1.42; 95%CI = 1.25, 1.61), and CT vs. CC (OR = 1.20; 95%CI = 1.09, 1.32). Subgroup analyses revealed stronger associations in CSVD-NOS. However, the trim-and-fill method indicated significant publication bias, with adjusted ORs becoming non-significant (recessive model: OR =1.10, 95% CI=0.81, 1.49). Heterogeneity was low to moderate across models ( Conclusion: This study highlights the significant association between MTHFR C677T genotyping and CSVD. Early assessment of MTHFR C677T genotyping during the clinical evaluation of elderly patients may improve patient management and reduce the adverse prognostic impact of the CSVD burden. However, further validation of these findings in large-scale, high-quality prospective studies is required. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; identifier: CRD42023339320.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.