ArticleAdvanced healthcare materials2025
Mandibular Implants: A Metamaterial-Based Approach to Reducing Stress Shielding.
Article in Advanced healthcare materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel multifunctional split-type porous biomimetic absorbable mPLA-HA lamina for spinal posterior column reconstruction following laminectomy.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Three-Dimensional Surgical Planning in Mandibular Cancer: A Decade of Clinical Experience and Outcomes.Cancers · 2026Article
- Case Report: Reconstruction of the chest wall with titanium alloy plates after resection of a rare malignant spindle cell tumor of the sternum complicated by ankylosing spondylitis.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Predictive bite force modelling of head and neck oncology patients for clinical mandibular reconstruction applications.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Mandibular Implants: A Metamaterial-Based Approach to Reducing Stress Shielding.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biomechanical complications, such as stress shielding, bone resorption, and reconstruction failure, are prevalently associated with solid titanium mandible reconstruction plates. This study evaluates the potential of metamaterial designs with porous gyroid microarchitectures, to enhance biomechanical stimulation and mitigate these complications. A novel metamaterial reconstruction plate is compared with solid titanium plates, both patient-specifically designed and fabricated from Ti6Al4 V alloy. Stress shielding is assessed through photoelasticity experiments and validated with finite element analysis (FEA). Transparent mandible models are loaded incrementally (0-1000 N) to analyze stress distributions in the implants, screws, and mandible segments. The metamaterial plate reduces stress concentrations in the distant mandibular regions from the defect, while increasing stress around the screws near the defect, favoring local mechanical stimulation. FEA confirms improved load distribution (p = 0.003). However, the metamaterial plate exhibited a lower load-bearing capacity, failing at 775 N, while the solid plate withstood 1800 N without failure. Yet, the metamaterial design effectively reduced stress shielding, thereby enhancing biomechanical function near critical mandibular regions. Hence, despite their reduced load-bearing capacity, they can, potentially, preserve bone integrity and prevent implant failure that should be validated in future (pre-)clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.