Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40185865›Full record

ReviewPediatric research2025

Genomics and multiomics in the age of precision medicine.

Srinivasan Mani, Seema R Lalani, Mohan Pammi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Srinivasan ManiDepartment of Pediatrics, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA. smani3@buffalo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6604-2391
Seema R LalaniDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Mohan PammiDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precision medicine is a transformative healthcare model that utilizes an understanding of a person's genome, environment, lifestyle, and interplay to deliver customized healthcare. Precision medicine has the potential to improve the health and productivity of the population, enhance patient trust and satisfaction in healthcare, and accrue health cost-benefits both at an individual and population level. Through faster and cost-effective genomics data, next-generation sequencing has provided us the impetus to understand the nuances of complex interactions between genes, diet, and lifestyle that are heterogeneous across the population. The emergence of multiomics technologies, including transcriptomics, proteomics, epigenomics, metabolomics, and microbiomics, has enhanced the knowledge necessary for maximizing the applicability of genomics data for better health outcomes. Integrative multiomics, the combination of multiple 'omics' data layered over each other, including the interconnections and interactions between them, helps us understand human health and disease better than any of them separately. Integration of these multiomics data is possible today with the phenomenal advancements in bioinformatics, data sciences, and artificial intelligence. Our review presents a broad perspective on the utility and feasibility of a genomics-first approach layered with other omics data, offering a practical model for adopting an integrated multiomics approach in pediatric health care and research. IMPACT: Precision medicine provides a paradigm shift from a conventional, reactive disease control approach to proactive disease prevention and health preservation. Phenomenal advancements in bioinformatics, data sciences, and artificial intelligence have made integrative multiomics feasible and help us understand human health and disease better than any of them separately. The genotype-first approach or reverse phenotyping has the potential to overcome the limitations of the phenotype-first approach by identifying new genotype-phenotype associations, enhancing the subclassification of diseases by widening the phenotypic spectrum of genetic variants, and understanding functional mechanisms of genetic variations.

Indexed as

GenomicsPrecision MedicineComputational BiologyEpigenomicsHumansMetabolomicsMultiomicsPediatricsProteomics

Identifiers

PMID40185865
PMCPMC12106083

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.