Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40186005›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Introducing an adjustable upper limb prosthesis into a Ugandan clinical service: impacts on free living behaviour and prosthetic use.

N Pickard, B Mulindwa, L Gracey-McMinn, M Granat, A Chadwell, S Curtin, D Howard, L Ackers, R Ssekitoleko, L Kenney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

N PickardCentre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation Research, University of Salford, Salford, M6 6PU, UK.
B MulindwaBiomedical Engineering Unit, Department of Physiology, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
L Gracey-McMinnCentre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation Research, University of Salford, Salford, M6 6PU, UK.
M GranatCentre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation Research, University of Salford, Salford, M6 6PU, UK.
A ChadwellSchool of Healthcare Enterprise and Innovation, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 7NP, UK.
S CurtinCentre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation Research, University of Salford, Salford, M6 6PU, UK.
D HowardCentre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation Research, University of Salford, Salford, M6 6PU, UK.
L AckersCentre for Applied Health Research, University of Salford, Salford, M6 6PU, UK.
R SsekitolekoBiomedical Engineering Unit, Department of Physiology, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
L KenneyCentre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation Research, University of Salford, Salford, M6 6PU, UK. l.p.j.kenney@salford.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Access to prosthetic services in Uganda is poor, negatively impacting people with upper limb difference in function, community participation, and employment. Technologies to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of services are needed, but there is very little evidence of potential solutions. Off-the-shelf, adjustable prosthetic sockets, which can be fitted in minimal time without the complexities associated with traditional socket manufacturing, show promise. We tested the feasibility of introducing the Koalaa ALX, a prosthesis for people with trans-radial limb difference, and a peer-to-peer support system into a Ugandan clinical service. Prosthesis-worn and thigh-worn monitors successfully captured concurrent patterns of wear and free-living physical behaviours (including periods at home and away) at baseline, post-fitting, and six months post-fitting. End-of-study interviews captured participants' experiences. Four of the eight participants had no previous experience using a prosthesis (new users). The ALX could be easily deployed and supported. All participants wore their ALX, with an increase in wear time among new users at six months. Prosthesis donning and doffing events were associated with behavioural changes (e.g., changes in stepping duration). The interviews revealed good levels of satisfaction, though concerns about access to repairs, cleaning, heat discomfort, and long-term support were noted.

Indexed as

AmputeesArtificial LimbsProsthesis DesignUpper ExtremityAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUgandaAppropriate technologyProstheticsReal-world behavioursUgandaUpper-limb

Identifiers

PMID40186005
PMCPMC11971239

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.