Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40186181›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2025

Nanopore versus Illumina to study the gut bacterial diversity of sows and piglets between farms with high and low health status.

Carla Tort-Miró, Laura Lorenzo-Rebenaque, Laura Montoro-Dasi, Santiago Vega, Juan Carlos Rodríguez, María-Paz Ventero, Maria Teresa Pérez-Gracia, Judith Guitart-Matas, Noemí Giler-Baquerizo, Ana Marco-Fuertes and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Carla Tort-MiróAnimal Health Program (CReSA), Collaborating Centre of the World Organization for Animal Health for Research and Control of Emerging and Re-emerging Pig Diseases in Europe, Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology (IRTA-CReSA), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Catalonia, 08193, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-5400-3495
Laura Lorenzo-RebenaqueInstitute of Science and Animal Technology, Universitat Politècnica de Valencia, Valencia, 46022, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4759-258X
Laura Montoro-DasiFacultad de Veterinaria, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Alfara del Patriarca, Valencia, 46115, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3130-0933
Santiago VegaFacultad de Veterinaria, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Alfara del Patriarca, Valencia, 46115, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4220-6029
Juan Carlos RodríguezMicrobiology Department, Dr. Balmis University General Hospital, Microbiology Division, Miguel Hernández University, ISABIAL, Alicante, 03010, Spain.
María-Paz VenteroMicrobiology Department, Dr. Balmis University General Hospital, Microbiology Division, Miguel Hernández University, ISABIAL, Alicante, 03010, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1979-0949
Maria Teresa Pérez-GraciaÁrea de Microbiología, Departamento de Farmacia, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Alfara del Patriarca, Valencia, 46115, Spain.
Judith Guitart-MatasAnimal Health Program (CReSA), Collaborating Centre of the World Organization for Animal Health for Research and Control of Emerging and Re-emerging Pig Diseases in Europe, Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology (IRTA-CReSA), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Catalonia, 08193, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-9329-9139
Noemí Giler-BaquerizoAnimal Health Program (CReSA), Collaborating Centre of the World Organization for Animal Health for Research and Control of Emerging and Re-emerging Pig Diseases in Europe, Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology (IRTA-CReSA), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Catalonia, 08193, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-9013-3192
Ana Marco-FuertesFacultad de Veterinaria, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Alfara del Patriarca, Valencia, 46115, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9962-6254
Giuseppe D'AuriaSequencing and Bioinformatics Service, Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of Valencia Region, FISABIO, Valencia, 46020, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0672-2541
Clara MarinFacultad de Veterinaria, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Alfara del Patriarca, Valencia, 46115, Spain. clara.marin@uchceu.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6152-3778
Lourdes Migura-GarciaAnimal Health Program (CReSA), Collaborating Centre of the World Organization for Animal Health for Research and Control of Emerging and Re-emerging Pig Diseases in Europe, Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology (IRTA-CReSA), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Catalonia, 08193, Spain. lourdes.migura@irta.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2935-928X

Funding

I+D+I National Program PID2021-125641OB-C22 and PID2021-125641OB-C21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntibiotics are used in animal husbandry to control infectious diseases. Different stressors can compromise animal health, leaving piglets vulnerable to pathogens, especially enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC), which causes post-weaning diarrhoea (PWD), the major source of mortality and morbidity in swine production. Furthermore, PWD is a recurrent disease for certain farms, suggesting a link between gut microbial composition and animal health. The aim of this study was to identify the intestinal microbiota of pigs on farms with high health status (HHS) and low health status (LHS) to determine the relationships between sanitary status and gut health. Therefore, three pig farms with LHS presenting recurrent problems of PWD and three farms with HHS were selected to characterise the intestinal microbiome of sows and their piglets. 16 S rRNA gene sequencing technology was used to determine the associations of the gut microbiome with health. With the aim of bringing the MinION Nanopore device to the field for its portability and taxonomic resolution, the results obtained with Illumina were compared to those obtained with Nanopore.

resultsOverall, the results indicated remarkable differences in intestinal microbial communities between animals from LHS farms and those from HHS farms, suggesting that the microbiomes of LHS animals were enriched with potential pathogenic microorganisms, mainly from the Pseudomonadota phylum, such as the genus Escherichia-Shigella, and their associated related species. Moreover, animals from HHS were enriched with beneficial microorganisms, such as Lactobacillus spp., Christensenellaceae R7 group, Treponema, Acetitomaculum and Oscillospiraceae UCG-005.

conclusionsThis study identifies potential microorganisms that may contribute to health and disease in pig farms with HHS and LHS, suggesting that tracking their occurrence might provide insight into sanitary conditions. Moreover, this research highlights the compatibility between Illumina and Nanopore sequencing platforms, justifying the use of MinION Nanopore device in field applications for in situ studies of PWD. This application has the potential to enhance sustainable economic growth in swine farms by enabling more effective monitoring and management of animal health.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimal HusbandryAnimalsBacteriaDiarrheaFarmsFemaleHealth StatusNanoporesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSwineSwine DiseasesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAntimicrobial resistanceIllumina sequencingIntestinal microbiomeNanopore sequencingPigsPost-weaning diarrhoeaSwine

Identifiers

PMID40186181
PMCPMC11969850

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.