Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40186190›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2025

Analgesic efficacy of a laparoscopic-guided transversus abdominis plane block versus no transversus abdominis plane block in bariatric gastric bypass surgery a retrospective analysis among 332 individuals.

Gianluca De Santo, Oliver Stumpf, Peter Look, Marc Abdelmalek, Rolf Lefering, René Mantke, Christoph Paasch

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gianluca De Santo *Center of Obesity and Metabolic Surgery, Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch, Schwanebecker Chaussee 50, 13125, Berlin, Germany. gianluca.desanto@helios-gesundheit.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0393-0022
Oliver Stumpf *Center of Obesity and Metabolic Surgery, Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch, Schwanebecker Chaussee 50, 13125, Berlin, Germany.
Peter LookCenter of Obesity and Metabolic Surgery, Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch, Schwanebecker Chaussee 50, 13125, Berlin, Germany.
Marc AbdelmalekCenter of Obesity and Metabolic Surgery, Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch, Schwanebecker Chaussee 50, 13125, Berlin, Germany.
Rolf LeferingInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany.
René MantkeFaculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg, Germany.
Christoph PaaschDepartment of General Surgery, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, University Hospital Brandenburg, Brandenburg, Germany.

Funding

Helios Research Center HCRI 2020-0058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo reduce opioid consumption and improve early mobility, the administration of a transversus abdominis plane block (TAP) was introduced in abdominal surgery decades ago. But the usefulness of this nerve block prior to laparoscopic Roux-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) in patients with obesity is still under debate. Hence, the study at hand was conducted.

methodsIn 2023 a retrospective single-centre analysis among patients who did or did not receive a laparoscopic (L) TAP block prior to LRYGB was performed. The primary objective was the early postoperative pain level (1 h) using the visual analog scale (VAS) after LRYGB. Main secondary objectives were the determination of the pain level from 1 to 80 h after surgery and the cumulative postoperative painkiller use.

resultsA total of 111 individuals received and 202 did not receive a L-TAP block prior to LRYGB. The groups were homogeneous with respect to age, gender distribution and Body Mass Index. No L-TAP related complications occurred. After multivariate analysis the administration of the nerve block had no effect on relevant pain (VAS ≥ 6) from one to 80 h after LRYGB. One hour after surgery, the individuals who received the L-TAP suffered, with significance, from less pain (VAS score 2.77 vs. 3.84: p < 0.001) in comparison to those who did not receive the nerve block. No difference was revealed in terms of cumulative postoperative opioid painkiller use.

conclusionThe L-TAP block is a safe procedure and sufficiently reduces post-operative pain one hour after gastric bypass surgery, but does not bring any benefits in the further course.

Indexed as

Abdominal MusclesGastric BypassLaparoscopyNerve BlockObesity, MorbidPostoperative PainAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeObesityPainRoux-en-Y gastric bypassTransversus abdominis plane block

Identifiers

PMID40186190
PMCPMC11971858

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.