Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40186314›Full record

ArticleJournal of ovarian research2025

Construction and evaluation of machine learning-based prediction model for live birth following fresh embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.

Suqin Zhu, Zhiqing Huang, Xiaojing Chen, Wenwen Jiang, Yuan Zhou, Beihong Zheng, Yan Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ovarian research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Suqin Zhu *Center of Reproductive Medicine, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 18 Daoshan Road, Fuzhou City, 350001, Fujian Province, China.
Zhiqing Huang *Center of Reproductive Medicine, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 18 Daoshan Road, Fuzhou City, 350001, Fujian Province, China.
Xiaojing ChenCenter of Reproductive Medicine, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 18 Daoshan Road, Fuzhou City, 350001, Fujian Province, China.
Wenwen JiangCenter of Reproductive Medicine, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 18 Daoshan Road, Fuzhou City, 350001, Fujian Province, China.
Yuan ZhouCenter of Reproductive Medicine, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 18 Daoshan Road, Fuzhou City, 350001, Fujian Province, China.
Beihong ZhengCenter of Reproductive Medicine, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 18 Daoshan Road, Fuzhou City, 350001, Fujian Province, China. zhengbeihong2010@163.com.
Yan SunCenter of Reproductive Medicine, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 18 Daoshan Road, Fuzhou City, 350001, Fujian Province, China. sunyanteam@163.com.

Funding

the Fujian provincial health technology project 2022GGA035the Fujian Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China 2020J05279the Fujian Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China 2023J011221the Fujian Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China 2023J011229the innovation Platform Project of Science and Technology 2021Y2012the Joint Funds for the innovation of science and Technology, Fujian province 2020Y9137the Joint Funds for the innovation of science and Technology, Fujian province 2024Y9572the major Scientific Research Program for Young and Middle-aged Health Professionals of Fujian Province 2022ZQNZD010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the determinants affecting live birth outcomes in fresh embryo transfer among polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients using various machine learning (ML) algorithms and to construct predictive models, offering novel insights for enhancing live birth rates in this specific group.

methodsA sum of 1,062 fresh embryo transfer cycles involving PCOS patients were analyzed, with 466 resulting in live births. The dataset was split randomly into training and testing subsets at a 7:3 ratio. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and recursive feature elimination methods were utilized for feature selection within the training data. A grid search strategy identified the optimal parameters for seven ML models: decision tree (DT), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), naive Bayes model(NBM), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). The evaluation of model effectiveness incorporated diverse metrics, encompassing area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, F1 score, and Brier score. Calibration curves and decision curve analysis were employed to ascertain the optimal model. Furthermore, Shapley additive explanations were applied to elucidate the importance of predictor variables in the top-performing model.

resultsThe AUC values of DT, KNN, LightGBM, NBM, RF, SVM and XGBoost models in the training set were 0.813, 1.000, 0.724, 0.791, 1.000, 0.819 and 0.853, respectively. Corresponding values in the testing set were 0.773, 0.719, 0.705, 0.764, 0.794, 0.806 and 0.822. XGBoost emerged as the most effective ML model. SHAP analysis revealed that variables encompassing embryo transfer count, embryo type, maternal age, infertility duration, body mass index, serum testosterone (T) levels, and progesterone (P) levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration were pivotal predictors of live birth outcomes in individuals with PCOS receiving fresh embryo transfer.

conclusionThis study developed a live birth prediction model tailored for PCOS fresh embryo transfer cycles, leveraging ML algorithms to compare the efficacy of multiple models. The XGBoost model demonstrated superior predictive capacity, enabling prompt and precise identification of critical risk factors influencing live birth outcomes in PCOS patients. These findings offer actionable insights for clinical intervention, guiding strategies to improve pregnancy outcomes in this population. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Embryo TransferFertilization in VitroMachine LearningPolycystic Ovary SyndromeSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicAdultFemaleHumansLive BirthPregnancyFresh embryo transferLive birthMachine learningPolycystic ovary syndrome

Identifiers

PMID40186314
PMCPMC11969817

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.