ReviewDiabetologia2025
Clinical use of polygenic scores in type 2 diabetes: challenges and possibilities.
Review in Diabetologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Converging TCF7L2 and CDKAL1 pathways in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus.Acta diabetologica · 2026Review
- Insights into the genetic aetiology of diabetes in Africa.EBioMedicine · 2026Review
- Predictive Biomarkers for Asymptomatic Adults: Opportunities, Risks, and Guidance for General Practice.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Systemic effects of type 2 diabetes therapies: an integrated perspective on the cardio-renal- cerebral-metabolic axis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Diabetes prevention and treatment: a global perspective.Diabetologia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Resulting from a combination of genetic and environmental factors, type 2 diabetes is highly heterogeneous in manifestation and disease progression, with the only common feature being chronic hyperglycaemia. In spite of vigorous efforts to elucidate the pathogenetic origins and natural course of the disease, there is still a lack of biomarkers and tools for prevention, disease stratification and treatment. Genome-wide association studies have reported over 1200 variants associated with type 2 diabetes, and the decreased cost of generating genetic data has facilitated the development of polygenic scores for estimating an individual's genetic disease risk based on combining effects from most-or all-genetic variants. In this review, we summarise the current knowledge on type 2 diabetes-related polygenic scores in different ancestries and outline their possible clinical role. We explore the potential applicability of type 2 diabetes polygenic scores to quantify genetic liability for prediction, screening and risk stratification. Given that most genetic risk loci are determined from populations of European origin while other ancestries are under-represented, we also discuss the challenges around their global applicability. To date, the potential for clinical utility of polygenic scores for type 2 diabetes is limited, with such scores outperformed by clinical measures. In the future, rather than predicting risk of type 2 diabetes, the value of polygenic scores may be in stratification of the severity of disease (risk for comorbidities) and treatment response, in addition to aiding in dissecting the pathophysiological mechanisms involved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.