ArticleCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2025
Data-driven classification of narrative speech characteristics in stroke aphasia distinguishes neurological and strategic contributions.
Article in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond Individual Features: Computational Analysis of Linguistic Coordination in Dementia Speech.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of acupuncture for post-stroke aphasia: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Narrative speech deficits are common in post-stroke aphasia, resulting in negative influences on social participation and quality of life. Speech rate, complexity, and informativeness deficits all contribute to narrative speech. Research studies typically (implicitly) assume that these aspects of narrative speech production are a result of cognitive/neurological impairment, but they may also result from strategic choices made as individuals with aphasia attempt to produce narrative speech. Here, we used data-driven methods to classify aphasic narrative speech patterns and evaluated their predictability from lesion patterns. 76 stroke aphasia patients completed 11 narrative speech production tasks. Quantitative Production Analysis (QPA) and Correct Information Unit (CIU) analysis were used to measure their structural and functional properties. Based on prior work, we selected QPA measures of speech rate (words per minute) and complexity (mean sentence length, inflection index, and auxiliary index) and four CIU measures of informativeness (#CIU, CIU/min, %CIU, #nonCIU). These measures produced two orthogonal dimensions with four orthogonal participant clusters. Comprehensive comparison between clusters revealed that speech rate and complexity were strongly associated with general aphasia severity and total lesion volume, and were predicted by frontoparietal grey matter and dorsal pathway white matter damage. In contrast, informativeness was independent of other behavioral and neurological deficits, and was not predictable from lesion patterns, suggesting that it reflects communication strategy rather than specific neurological impairment. These results provide an important step toward distinguishing neurological and strategic aspects of narrative speech deficits in post-stroke aphasia, with potential implications for treatment approaches that target communication strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.