SynthesisBMJ open2025
What are the experiences of people with heart failure regarding participation in physical activity? A systematic review, meta-aggregation and development of a logic model.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Changes in Physical Activity Following Heart Failure in Humans and Animal Models: A Scoping Review.Current heart failure reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo (1) synthesise the experiences of people with heart failure and those who care for them concerning participation in physical activity (2) develop a logic model for a future intervention which will support people with heart failure to feel confident and safe in being physically active.
designA systematic review and meta-aggregation using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Emcare and PsycINFO databases were searched through until June 2024 inclusively. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies with a qualitative design, including qualitative components of mixed-methods studies, which describe experiences of participation in physical activity by adults with chronic heart failure. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers used standardised methods to search and screen studies. Data extraction included the PROGRESS-Plus items. The JBI checklist for qualitative studies was applied. Meta-aggregation guided by JBI methods was used to synthesise the data. This evidence, along with input from a patient and public involvement group, healthcare professionals and charity organisations, was used to develop a logic model.
resultsWe included 28 papers (25 studies) comprising 14 qualitative studies and 11 mixed-method studies describing the perspectives of 483 people with heart failure, 64 carers and 12 healthcare professionals.The meta-aggregation produced seven synthesised findings describing the impact of physical symptoms, emotional factors, extrinsic factors, access to knowledge, self-motivation and peer/professional motivation and the positive impact of physical activity. The PROGRESS-PLUS tool identified significant inclusivity issues within the studies. The meta-aggregation with relevant contributor input informed behavioural determinants and potential intervention components of a logic model.
conclusionsThis study identifies behavioural determinants that underlie the actions of people with heart failure in their relationship with physical activity and potential intervention components for a novel intervention design to support this population. There is a lack of studies exploring health professionals' and carers' perspectives on this topic. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022342883.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.