ArticleBMJ open2025
Development of an evaluation programme for the intelligent management of mobile infectious disease hospitals in response to public health emergencies: a Delphi study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Operational efficiency in public infectious disease hospitals across 31 provinces in China: a three-phase data envelopment analysis.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Improving medication safety and efficiency in hospital pharmacy through a pharmacist-led, low-code mobile application: a prospective study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo construct a scientific and practical intelligent management assessment programme for mobile infectious disease hospitals and explore pathways to enhance their management effectiveness.
designA preliminary pool of indicators was developed based on policy documents issued by the Chinese government. Two rounds of Delphi expert consultations were conducted via email between February and August 2024. These indicators were then refined using the margin method. Finally, a hierarchical analysis was employed to assign weights to each indicator. SETTING AND
participantsIn line with the policy guidance of the Chinese government, an initial set of assessment indicators for smart management of mobile infectious disease hospitals was established. 32 experts with extensive knowledge in the construction of smart management systems for such hospitals were chosen to participate in the Delphi study, offering a comprehensive professional perspective.
resultsThe Cr values were 0.860 (Round 1) and 0.894 (Round 2), demonstrating the accuracy and reliability of the expert consultations. The coordination coefficient among the experts was statistically significant at the p<0.01 level, reflecting a high degree of consensus. In total, 29 assessment items for the smart management of mobile infectious disease hospitals were finalised.
conclusionsA comprehensive set of indicators for assessing smart management in mobile infectious disease hospitals has been developed. This system is scientific, logical and dependable, providing effective guidance for the smart development of such hospitals. It not only improves the quality and efficiency of medical services but also safeguards patients' health rights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.