ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025
GEM-CRAP: a fusion architecture for focal seizure detection.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIdentification of seizures is essential for the treatment of epilepsy. Current machine-learning and deep-learning models often perform well on public datasets when classifying generalized seizures with prominent features. However, their performance was less effective in detecting brief, localized seizures. These seizure-like patterns can be masked by fixed brain rhythms.
methodsOur study proposes a supervised multilayer hybrid model called GEM-CRAP (gradient-enhanced modulation with CNN-RES, attention-like, and pre-policy networks), with three parallel feature extraction channels: a CNN-RES module, an amplitude-aware channel with attention-like mechanisms, and an LSTM-based pre-policy layer integrated into the recurrent neural network. The model was trained on the Xuanwu Hospital and HUP iEEG dataset, including intracranial, cortical, and stereotactic EEG data from 83 patients, covering over 8500 labeled electrode channels for hybrid classification (wakefulness and sleep). A post-SVM network was used for secondary training on channels with classification accuracy below 80%. We introduced an average channel deviation rate metric to assess seizure detection accuracy.
resultsFor public datasets, the model achieved over 97% accuracy for intracranial and cortical EEG sequences in patients, and over 95% for mixed sequences, with deviations below 5%. In the Xuanwu Hospital dataset, it maintained over 94% accuracy for wakefulness seizures and around 90% during sleep. SVM secondary training improved average channel accuracy by over 10%. Additionally, a strong positive correlation was found between channel accuracy distribution and the temporal distribution of seizure states.
conclusionsGEM-CRAP enhances focal epilepsy detection through adaptive adjustments and attention mechanisms, achieving higher precision and robustness in complex signal environments. Beyond improving seizure interval detection, it excels in identifying and analyzing specific epileptic waveforms, such as high-frequency oscillations. This advancement may pave the way for more precise epilepsy diagnostics and provide a suitable artificial intelligence algorithm for closed-loop neurostimulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.