ArticleScientific reports2025
Implications of intrinsic capacity subtypes for post-PCI patients older than 45.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early nurse-assessed intrinsic capacity stratifies rehospitalization risk after percutaneous coronary intervention in coronary artery disease patients.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aim to explore the contributing factors to intrinsic capacity (IC) in middle-aged and older patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Intrinsic capacity comprises six core domains: cognition, locomotion, vitality, psychology, vision, and hearing. Each domain was assessed in detail using different scales, based on which the composite IC score was calculated. The study employed latent class analysis (LCA) to identify the various IC subtypes. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine the effect variables of IC subtypes. 318 middle-aged and older post-PCI patients filled out the assessments. Three distinct IC subtypes were found: 47.8% poor audition-vision group (class 1), 38% high cognition-psychology group (class 2), and 14.2% low locomotion-vitality group (class 3). The IC subtype classification may be impacted by factors such as cTnI, NT proBNP, cardiac function, exercise frequency, and comorbidities. Examining IC subtypes may be helpful for focused intervention, and further empirical research is still needed to determine their drivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.