ArticleBMC medicine2025
Cumulative social disadvantage and its impact on long COVID: insights from a U.S. national survey.
Article in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characteristics Associated with Mental and Physical Health Among US Adults with Long COVID.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Prevalence and Risk Factors for Persistent Post-COVID-19 Condition at 3, 6, 12, and 18 Months After Initial Infection Among Adults Living in a Community of Japan: Yao COVID-19 Study.Journal of medical virology · 2026Article
- Characterization of Post-Viral Infection Behaviors Among Patients With Long COVID: Prospective, Observational, Longitudinal Cohort Analyses of Fitbit Data and Patient-Reported Outcomes.JMIR formative research · 2025Observational
- Supporting healthy weight in times of crisis: results of a one-year community health worker-led intervention among food (in)secure low-income Latinas.BMC public health · 2025Article
- A Multidimensional Assessment of Sleep Disorders in Long COVID Using the Alliance Sleep Questionnaire.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated health disparities, with long COVID emerging as a major global public health challenge. Although clinical risk factors for long COVID are well-documented, the cumulative burden of adverse social determinants of health (SDoH) remains underexplored. This study aims to investigate the association between cumulative social disadvantage and long COVID.
methodsUsing data from the 2022 and 2023 National Health Interview Survey cycles (n = 16,446 U.S.adults), cumulative social disadvantage was quantified through 18 SDoH indicators and categorized into quartiles. The highest quartile represents the most disadvantaged individuals. Long COVID was defined as self-reported symptoms persisting for three months or longer. Weighted logistic regression models were used to examine the association, adjusting for demographic and clinical variables.
resultsAdults in the highest quartile of cumulative social disadvantage exhibited an increased odds of experiencing long COVID compared to those in the lowest quartile (AOR = 2.52, 95% Cl: 2.13, 2.98). This association persisted across demographic subgroups, with particularly pronounced effects among women and non-Hispanic Blacks. Hispanics and non-Hispanic Whites showed weaker, but still statistically significant. Key contributors included mental health difficulties, economic instability, and healthcare access barriers. Furthermore, cumulative social disadvantage was linked to fair or poor general health status among individuals with long COVID.
conclusionsThis study highlights the positive association between cumulative social disadvantage and long COVID. Addressing systemic inequities through integrated public health strategies is essential to mitigate the burden of long COVID and reduce social disparities in health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.