ArticleBMC biology2025
PBertKla: a protein large language model for predicting human lysine lactylation sites.
Article in BMC biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in plant salt stress research: from predictive models to multi-omics integration.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Review
- Training PBertKla on an Integrated Multi-Source Dataset with a Machine-Learning Layer for Lysine Lactylation Site Prediction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Hyperhomocysteinemia in chronic schizophrenia: prevalence, clinical correlates, and paradoxical associations with symptom severity.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026Article
- Unraveling the role of lactylation in cell death and correlative diseases: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Protein lactylation in Alzheimer's disease: bridging metabolism, pathology, and therapeutic opportunity.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
- Beyond Fuel: Exercise-Induced Lactate as a Metabolic-Epigenetic Regulator in Central Nervous System Health and Disease.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- AIPred: comprehensive prediction and analysis of non-histone acetylation via protein language model and interpretable machine learning.BMC biology · 2025Article
- Lactylation in tumor: mechanisms and therapeutic potentials.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLactylation is a newly discovered type of post-translational modification, primarily occurring on lysine (K) residues of both histones and non-histones to exert diverse effects on target proteins. Research has shown that lysine lactylation (Kla) modification is ubiquitous in different cells and participates in the determination of cell function and fate, as well as in the initiation and progression of various diseases. Precise identification of Kla sites is fundamental for elucidating their biological functions and uncovering their application potential.
resultsHere, we proposed a novel human Kla site predictor (named PBertKla) through curating a reliable benchmark dataset with proper sample length and sequence identity threshold to train a protein large language model with optimal hyperparameters. Extensive experimental results consistently demonstrated that our model possessed robust human Kla site prediction ability, achieving an AUC (area under receiver operating characteristic curve) value of over 0.880 on the independent validation data. Feature visualization analysis further validated the effectiveness of in feature learning and representation from Kla sequences. Moreover, we benchmarked PBertKla against other cutting-edge models on an independent testing dataset from different sources, highlighting its superiority and transferability.
conclusionsAll results indicated that PBertKla excelled as an automatic predictor of human Kla sites, and it would advance the investigation of lactylation modifications and their significance in health and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.