Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40189634›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2025

Recommended nutrition for preterm infants-on track, but more research is needed.

William W Hay

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

William W HayProfessor (Pediatrics, Neonatology), Retired, University of Colorado, 401 Hudson Street, Denver, CO, 80220, USA. bill.hay@ucdenver.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this issue of Pediatric Research, Naseh, et al. document that extremely to very preterm infants fed recommended macronutrient intakes using early parenteral nutrition and early and reasonably rapidly advanced enteral feeding of supplemented maternal and donor milk have relatively common outcomes of brain size and morphology at term gestational age and cognition at 2 years of age. Growth rates, ranges of data, and data for individual infants would have been helpful to better assess the impact of the feeding approaches and macronutrient intakes on growth and development of the study infants, but the success of Naseh, et al.'s feeding approaches and meeting recommended macronutrient intakes is encouraging. IMPACT: Preterm infants who are fed recommended macronutrient intakes using early parenteral nutrition and early enteral feeding of supplemented maternal and donor milk have relatively common brain size and morphology at term gestation and cognition at 2 years. These results expand the literature documenting that following rational feeding guidelines produces more optimal nutritional outcomes of preterm infants. Early enteral feeding helps produce more optimal nutrition for preterm infants. More research is needed to produce more optimal intravenous amino acid and lipid products and more optimal feeding approaches, and assess longer term growth, neurodevelopment, and cogniation.

Indexed as

Enteral NutritionInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaInfant, PrematureBrainChild DevelopmentCognitionGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMilk, HumanParenteral Nutrition

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.