SynthesisAnnals of Saudi medicine

Gastrointestinal safety of semaglutide and tirzepatide vs. placebo in obese individuals without diabetes: a systematic review and meta analysis.

Moaz Safwan, Mariam Safwan Bourgleh, Shahad Abdullah Alotaibi, Eman Alotaibi, Abdulsalam Al-Ruqi, Fathiya El Raeya

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of Saudi medicine. The graph read 3 numbers from its abstract, feeding 2 cells of the map: it supports the treatment in 2. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

3numbers the graph read from it
2cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
21 · no effect
Overall GI adverse eventstirzepatide vs placebofavours the comparator · obesityfeeds one cell of the map
RR 2.942.61 to 3.32
RESULTS: Overall GI adverse events were 1.86 times higher with *both* agents (95% CI=1.56, 2.21), with tirzepatide showing a greater risk (RR 2.94, 95% CI=2.61, 3.32) than semaglutide (RR 1.68, 95% CI=1.46, 1.94).
Overall GI adverse eventssemaglutide vs placebofavours the comparator · obesityfeeds one cell of the map
RR 1.681.46 to 1.94
RESULTS: Overall GI adverse events were 1.86 times higher with *both* agents (95% CI=1.56, 2.21), with tirzepatide showing a greater risk (RR 2.94, 95% CI=2.61, 3.32) than semaglutide (RR 1.68, 95% CI=1.46, 1.94).
Overall GI adverse eventsboth agents (semaglutide and tirzepatide) vs placebofavours the comparator · obesityfeeds 2 cells of the map
RR 1.861.56 to 2.21
RESULTS: Overall GI adverse events were 1.86 times higher with *both* agents (95% CI=1.56, 2.21), with tirzepatide showing a greater risk (RR 2.94, 95% CI=2.61, 3.32) than semaglutide (RR 1.68, 95% CI=1.46, 1.94).

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

GIP/GLP-1 & amylin agonists×adverse events & safety

SupportsOpen on the map →What to test next →

4 readable studies in this cell: 2 favour the treatment, 2 find no difference, 0 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.00contested · 0 families support, 3 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
0 · no effect
NCT0498257592 enrolled · 2021
Δ -0.30-0.79 to 0.19
NCT0408133755 enrolled · 2020
Δ -0.03-0.05 to -0.02
NCT0405055342 enrolled · 2020
Δ -0.89-4.10 to 2.33

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

GLP-1 receptor agonists×adverse events & safety

SupportsOpen on the map →What to test next →

40 readable studies in this cell: 45 favour the treatment, 14 find no difference, 2 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.00contested · 0 families support, 39 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
0 · no effect
NCT017204463,297 enrolled · 2013
Δ -0.66-0.80 to -0.52
NCT036893742,274 enrolled · 2018
Δ -0.29-0.38 to -0.20
NCT013360231,663 enrolled · 2011
Treatment contrast -0.64-0.75 to -0.53
NCT040178321,441 enrolled · 2019
Δ -0.20-0.30 to -0.10
NCT018365231,398 enrolled · 2013
Δ -0.20-0.32 to -0.07
NCT019301881,231 enrolled · 2013
Δ -1.06-1.21 to -0.91
NCT007344741,202 enrolled · 2008
Δ -0.71-0.87 to -0.55
NCT008389031,049 enrolled · 2009
Δ -0.91-1.16 to -0.65
NCT009606611,036 enrolled · 2009
Δ -0.04-0.18 to 0.11
NCT050350821,018 enrolled · 2021
Δ -0.24-0.44 to -0.04
NCT01064687978 enrolled · 2010
Δ -1.05-1.22 to -0.88
NCT01117350978 enrolled · 2010
Δ 2.54-3.88 to 8.93

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Peptide Hormones in Appetite Regulation: A Complex Network.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
6 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Moaz SafwanFrom the Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, Sulaiman Al Rajhi University, Al Bukayriyah, Saudi Arabia.
Mariam Safwan BourglehFrom the Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, Sulaiman Al Rajhi University, Al Bukayriyah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0004-2050-9055
Shahad Abdullah AlotaibiFrom the Department of Emergency Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Eman AlotaibiFrom the Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraidah, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulsalam Al-RuqiFrom the Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, Sulaiman Al Rajhi University, Al Bukayriyah, Saudi Arabia.
Fathiya El RaeyaFrom the Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, Sulaiman Al Rajhi University, Al Bukayriyah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

introductionSemaglutide and tirzepatide are newly approved glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for weight management in adults without diabetes. However, safety concerns regarding gastrointestinal (GI) adverse outcomes have been raised. This review comprehensively evaluates their GI safety profile in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

methodsThirteen RCTs involving 26 894 obese participants without diabetes were analyzed. Pooled analysis assessed the risks for GI, biliary, hepatic, and pancreatic adverse events.

resultsOverall GI adverse events were 1.86 times higher with *both* agents (95% CI=1.56, 2.21), with tirzepatide showing a greater risk (RR 2.94, 95% CI=2.61, 3.32) than semaglutide (RR 1.68, 95% CI=1.46, 1.94). Semaglutide increased gallbladder-related disorders, particularly cholelithiasis, by over 2.6 times (95% CI=1.40, 4.82), while tirzepatide showed no significant biliary risk. Neither agent significantly increased hepatic or pancreatic adverse events.

conclusionCompared to placebo, both Semaglutide and tirzepatide are associated with increased GI adverse outcomes, with most cases being mild. Clinicians should carefully monitor patients for potential adverse outcomes.

Indexed as

Anti-Obesity AgentsGastrointestinal DiseasesGlucagon-Like PeptidesObesityTirzepatideAdultGlucagon-Like Peptide 1Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSemaglutideAnti-Obesity AgentsGlucagon-Like Peptide 1Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsGlucagon-Like PeptidesSemaglutideTirzepatide

Identifiers

PMID40189856
PMCPMC12542916

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.