ArticleDigital health
Risk factors and a predictive model for mixed urinary incontinence among parous women: Insights from a large-scale multicenter epidemiological investigation.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Risk Factors and Quality of Life in Women with Urinary Incontinence in Kazakhstan: A Multicenter Case-Control Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to identify independent risk factors for mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) in parous women using a multicenter epidemiological study and to establish and validate a predictive nomogram. Methods: A large-scale survey was conducted from June 2022 to September 2023, including parous women aged over 20 selected through stratified random sampling. Data encompassed sociodemographic and obstetric histories, comorbidities, and standardized questionnaires. The primary goal was to identify high-risk factors for MUI, while the secondary was to develop a nomogram. Risk factors were determined using univariable and multivariable analyses. The nomogram's performance was assessed via concordance index (C-index) and calibration plots through internal and external validation. Results: A total of 7709 women participated, with an MUI prevalence of 6.8%. Independent risk factors included higher body mass index, urban residence, postmenopausal status, multiple vaginal deliveries, history of pelvic surgery and macrosomia, family history of pelvic floor dysfunction, hypertension, and constipation. The area under the curve for the nomogram model was 0.717 in the training set, 0.714 for internal validation, and 0.725 for external validation. The calibration plots showed a good agreement between the predicted and observed outcomes. Conclusion: This study identifies key risk factors for MUI in parous women and introduces a validated nomogram with high but not perfect predictive accuracy. The model enables early identification and management of MUI, though further refinement could enhance accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.