ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Computational fluid dynamics modelling of hemodynamics in aortic aneurysm and dissection: a review.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient-Specific Fluid-Structure Interaction Simulations Suggest Wall-Shear-Stress-Related Biomarkers in Type B Dissection Associated with Marfan Syndrome.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Assessment of cardiac allograft vasculopathy in heart transplant patients using multidimensional dynamic CTA and principal components analysis.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Optimizing Aortic Valve Replacement Through Strategic Upsizing: A Modern Framework for Lifetime Valve Management.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Patient-specific digital twins in aortic disease: integrating computational hemodynamics, immune profiling, and precision endovascular strategy.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Toward Digital Twins for Optimal Radioembolization.PET clinics · 2026Review
- Hemodynamic Impact of the Aberrant Subclavian Artery: A CFD Investigation.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Harnessing Nonlinear Mechanics to Transform Medical Diagnostics.Applied mechanics reviews · 2025Article
- Perforator-Sparing Microsurgical Clipping of Tandem Dominant-Hemisphere Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms: Geometry-Guided Reconstruction of a Wide-Neck Bifurcation and Dorsal M1 Fusiform Lesion.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Can computational fluid dynamics simulations predict a distal stent graft-induced new entry after frozen elephant trunk operation?Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Efficacy of multimodal rehabilitation strategies on gastrointestinal function recovery in postoperative aortic dissection patients: a narrative review.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
- Estimating flow division in aortic branches of diseased aorta: a method for boundary condition specification in CFD analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hemodynamic analysis based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modelling is expected to improve risk stratification for patients with aortic aneurysms and dissections. However, the parameter settings in CFD simulations involve considerable variability and uncertainty. Additionally, the exact relationship between hemodynamic features and disease progression remains unclear. These challenges limit the clinical application of aortic hemodynamic models. This review presents a detailed overview of the workflow for CFD-based aortic hemodynamic analysis, with a focus on recent advancements in the field. We also conducted a systematic review of 27 studies with large sample sizes (n > 5) that examine the hemodynamic characteristics of aortic aneurysms and dissections. Some studies identified consistent relationships between hemodynamic features and disease progression, reinforcing the potential for clinical application of aortic hemodynamic models. However, limitations such as small sample sizes and oversimplified patient-specific models remain. These findings emphasize the need for larger, more detailed studies to refine CFD modelling strategies, strengthen the connection between hemodynamics and diseases, and ultimately facilitate the clinical use of aortic hemodynamic models in disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.