Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40190765›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

What is known about Indigenous women's dissatisfaction of Birthing experiences in mainstream maternity hospitals in Australia, Aotearoa, Canada, US, Kalaallit Nunaat and Sápmi? A systematic scoping review.

Nina Sivertsen, Tahlia Johnson, Grete Mehus, Tove Synnøve Mentsen Ness, Susan Smith, Josephine McGill

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nina SivertsenCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Tahlia JohnsonCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Grete MehusFaculty of Health Sciences, UiT Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Tove Synnøve Mentsen NessCentre for Sámi and Indigenous Studies, Faculty of Education and Art, Nord University, Levanger, Norway.
Susan SmithCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Josephine McGillLibrary Services, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Understanding Indigenous women's dissatisfaction with birthing experiences is vital for improving maternal healthcare. It highlights the need for compassionate, respectful care that meets women's physical and emotional needs. Addressing these concerns can enhance patient satisfaction, reduce postpartum mental health issues and wellness, and ensure safer, more positive outcomes for mothers and babies. Objectives: This scoping review aimed to identify what is known about Indigenous women's dissatisfaction of birthing experiences in mainstream maternity hospitals. Inclusion criteria: This review considered primary research studies that reported on reasons for dissatisfaction of birthing experiences, and strategies implemented to improve quality of clinical practice around women's dissatisfaction of birthing experiences in mainstream maternity hospitals in Australia, Aotearoa, Canada, US, Kalaallit Nunaat and Sápmi. Findings: A total of 22 manuscripts reporting 22 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the synthesis. Discussion: There is a need for culturally safe trauma informed care, inclusive communication, active decision-making involvement and greater inclusion of Indigenous perspectives in maternity care, including the involvement of Indigenous birth support workers where appropriate and inclusion of Birthing on Country models of care. Conclusion: This review reveals that the medicalisation and evacuation of Indigenous women for childbirth cause cultural, geographic, and social disconnection, despite infant safety benefits. It underscores the need for better cultural safety education, communication, and the inclusion of cultural practices in care, with support from Indigenous birth support workers being essential.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricHospitals, MaternityIndigenous PeoplesMaternal Health ServicesParturitionPatient SatisfactionAustraliaCanadaFemaleHumansPregnancyUnited Statesbirthingdissatisfactionhealthcarehospitalindigenousmainstream

Identifiers

PMID40190765
PMCPMC11970129

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.