Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40191048›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2025

Ten years of Women's Wellness research: Key lessons from conducting randomised controlled trials of a whole-of-lifestyle behavioural intervention.

Sarah M Balaam, Alexandra L McCarthy, Natalie K Vear, Mackenzie J Petie, Debra J Anderson, Janine P Porter-Steele

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah M BalaamGriffith Health Group Executive, Room 8.56, Ian O'Connor building (G40), Health Group Executive, Gold Coast campus, Griffith University, QLD, 4222, Australia.
Alexandra L McCarthyGriffith Health Group Executive, Room 8.56, Ian O'Connor building (G40), Health Group Executive, Gold Coast campus, Griffith University, QLD, 4222, Australia.
Natalie K VearSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Level 3, Chamberlain Building (35), The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Mackenzie J PetieSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Level 3, Chamberlain Building (35), The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Debra J AndersonFaculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, 235 Jones St, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia.
Janine P Porter-SteeleGriffith Health Group Executive, Room 8.56, Ian O'Connor building (G40), Health Group Executive, Gold Coast campus, Griffith University, QLD, 4222, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many women are diagnosed with breast cancer and while the survival of this cohort has improved, their likelihood of developing treatment-related chronic conditions is considerable. Over the last 10 years, our research group has developed and refined a whole-of-lifestyle intervention, the Women's Wellness after Cancer Program (WWACP), for women who have finished treatment for primarily breast and gynaecological cancers. Culturally-specific iterations of this program were recently completed with younger breast cancer survivors (aged <50 years) living in Australia, New Zealand/Aotearoa and Hong Kong. Over the last decade, various approaches have been used to trial the WWACP, mostly randomised controlled trials. While this methodology is considered the gold standard to determine efficacy in health and medical research, its limitations in our interventional research are apparent. In this opinion article, we discuss these limitations as well as alternative options for the appropriate testing of behavioural studies in women treated for cancer. We also discuss how the contribution of informed consumer advocates and participant consumers has influenced changes to our study designs.

Indexed as

Behavioural interventionBreast cancerGynaecological cancerLifestyle interventionNursingOncologyRandomised controlled trialStudy design

Identifiers

PMID40191048
PMCPMC11969401

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.