ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
Knowledge concept recognition in the learning brain via fMRI classification.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Knowledge concept recognition (KCR) aims to identify the concepts learned in the brain, which has been a longstanding area of interest for learning science and education. While many studies have investigated object recognition using brain fMRIs, there are limited research on identifying specific knowledge points within the classroom. In this paper, we propose to recognize the knowledge concepts in computer science by classifying the brain fMRIs taken when students are learning the concepts. More specifically, this study made attempts on two representation strategies, i.e., voxel and time difference. Based on the representations, we evaluated traditional classifiers and the combination of CNN and LSTM for KCR. Experiments are conducted on a public dataset collected from 25 students and teachers in a computer science course. The evaluations of classifying fMRI segments show that the used classifiers all can attain a good performance when using the time-difference representation, where the CNN-LSTM model reaches the highest accuracy. This research contributes to the understanding of human learning and supports the development of personalized learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.