ArticleInternational journal of preventive medicine2025
The Prognostic Yield of Admission Shock Index in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: SEMI-CI Study.
Article in International journal of preventive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Novel Mortality Index Unveils Smoking's Role in STEMI Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early identification of high-risk patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) helps prevent complications. The shock index (SI) is a bedside risk-stratification tool used in emergency departments. In this study, we aimed to assess the SI's predictive value for prognosticating in-hospital and one-year mortality, as well as one-year major cardiovascular events (MACEs). As secondary endpoints, we assessed the age SI's performance and the influence of prehospital transport factors on SI's predictive value. Methods: This prospective cohort study is named SEMI-CI and enrolled patients with STEMI who were referred to a cardiology hospital in Isfahan. We analyzed data on 867 patients with STEMI. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and heart rate (HR) upon admission were used to calculate SI. Patients were divided into two groups based on SI, and 277 patients had SI > 0.7. Results: In-hospital death, one-year mortality, and MACE were more prevalent in those patients presenting with SI ≥ 0.7. However, after multivariate adjustment, SI was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality and MACE, but it was not associated with one-year mortality. Furthermore, mortality rates increased from lower to higher age groups. Among patients transferred by emergency medical services to our hospital, SI showed prognostic implications for in-hospital mortality but not for one-year mortality. Conclusions: The current study showed that a positive SI and age SI are valuable risk-stratification tools to identify high-risk patients presenting with STEMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.