Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40191651›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025

Blood pressure measurement practices in children and adolescents within primary care setting.

Kamilė Čeponytė, Karolis Ažukaitis, Augustina Jankauskienė

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kamilė ČeponytėFaculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Karolis AžukaitisFaculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Augustina JankauskienėFaculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Poor compliance to the technical aspects of blood pressure (BP) measurement procedure may lead to inaccurate estimation of BP and misclassification of patients. However, the latter have not been explored systematically. We aimed to assess real-life BP measurement practices in Lithuanian children and adolescents at the primary care setting, and their compliance with current European Society of Hypertension (ESH) guidelines. Methods: Two cross-sectional surveys were conducted in Lithuania. The study population included parents, who have children aged 0-17 years, and was further enriched by adolescents aged 14-17 years. Original questionnaires were developed and used to survey the participants. Results: Study included 1,504 parents and 448 adolescents. Median age of the surveyed parents' children and adolescents was 6 years and 50.2 percent were female. Overall, among all children aged 3 years or older only 55% of respondents reported BP measurements at least once. The rates of BP measurements increased with age and exceeded 80 percent from 14 years. Only 3.3 percent of respondents reported no issues with BP measurement procedure. The most common errors included single measurements of BP (81.4%), lack of feedback (60.2%), incorrect positioning (40.7%), miscuffing (39.2%) and lack of rest period (27.9%). Conclusions: Our study reveals not only insufficient BP screening rates within Lithuanian primary care setting, but also high rates of technical errors during BP measurement procedure. Collectively, these issues likely contribute to misdiagnosing of arterial hypertension and suboptimal care of children who are at risk of inaccurate and imprecise BP results.

Indexed as

adolescentsblood pressurechildrenmeasurement techniqueprimary care setting

Identifiers

PMID40191651
PMCPMC11968715

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.