ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Blood pressure measurement practices in children and adolescents within primary care setting.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a cuff size prediction model for pediatric blood pressure measurement outside the office.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Poor compliance to the technical aspects of blood pressure (BP) measurement procedure may lead to inaccurate estimation of BP and misclassification of patients. However, the latter have not been explored systematically. We aimed to assess real-life BP measurement practices in Lithuanian children and adolescents at the primary care setting, and their compliance with current European Society of Hypertension (ESH) guidelines. Methods: Two cross-sectional surveys were conducted in Lithuania. The study population included parents, who have children aged 0-17 years, and was further enriched by adolescents aged 14-17 years. Original questionnaires were developed and used to survey the participants. Results: Study included 1,504 parents and 448 adolescents. Median age of the surveyed parents' children and adolescents was 6 years and 50.2 percent were female. Overall, among all children aged 3 years or older only 55% of respondents reported BP measurements at least once. The rates of BP measurements increased with age and exceeded 80 percent from 14 years. Only 3.3 percent of respondents reported no issues with BP measurement procedure. The most common errors included single measurements of BP (81.4%), lack of feedback (60.2%), incorrect positioning (40.7%), miscuffing (39.2%) and lack of rest period (27.9%). Conclusions: Our study reveals not only insufficient BP screening rates within Lithuanian primary care setting, but also high rates of technical errors during BP measurement procedure. Collectively, these issues likely contribute to misdiagnosing of arterial hypertension and suboptimal care of children who are at risk of inaccurate and imprecise BP results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.