ReviewAmerican journal of hematology2025
Clonal Hematopoiesis and Thrombosis.
Review in American journal of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning-guided high-throughput screening and molecular dynamics simulations facilitate the discovery of potential FXIIa inhibitors.Journal of molecular modeling · 2026Article
- Clonal Hematopoiesis (CHIP) in Pulmonary Embolism and CTEPH: Evidence, Mechanisms, and Risk Stratification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential in Cardiovascular Disease: Gene-Specific Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications.International journal of general medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) has been the focus of many research efforts in the last years and has emerged as a risk modifier for cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality. While substantial evidence has accumulated regarding its impact on arterial system diseases, the connection with venous thrombosis has only recently been explored. Both clinical and preclinical evidence suggest that the magnitude and mechanism underlying the association of CH with cardiovascular events vary depending on the specific mutated gene involved, indicating a causal link between CH and thrombosis development, not only in the arterial system, particularly in the context of atherosclerosis, but also in venous thrombosis. Although this growing body of knowledge has driven translational research and provided insights for improving clinical management, several questions remain unanswered. This review aims to summarize the available evidence on the link between CH and thrombosis, while highlighting the gaps that need to be addressed in future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.