Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40192808›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2025

An update on mammalian and non-mammalian animal models for biomarker development in neurodegenerative disorders.

Ribhav Mishra, Arun Upadhyay

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ribhav MishraSchool of Health Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA. mishr233@purdue.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6087-3941
Arun UpadhyayDepartment of Bioscience and Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bhilai, Chhattisgarh, 491002, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurodegeneration is one of the leading factor for death globally, affecting millions of people. Developing animal models are critical to understand biological processes and comprehend pathological hallmarks of neurodegenerative diseases. For decades, many animal models have served as excellent tools to determine the disease progression, develop diagnostic methods and design novel therapies against distinct pathologies. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of both, mammalian and non-mammalian animal models, with a focus on three most common and aggressive neurodegenerative disorders: Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and Spinocerebellar ataxia-1. We highlight various approaches including transgene, gene transfer, and chemically-induced methods used to develop disease models. In particular, we discuss applications of both non-mammalian and mammalian contributions in research on neurodegeneration. It is exciting to learn the roles of animal models in disease pathomechanisms, identifying biomarkers and hence devising novel interventions to treat neuropathological conditions.

Indexed as

BiomarkersDisease Models, AnimalNeurodegenerative DiseasesAlzheimer DiseaseAnimalsHumansParkinson DiseaseSpinocerebellar AtaxiasBiomarkersAlzheimer’s diseaseAnimal modelsBiomarkersNeurodegenerationNon-human primatesParkinson diseaseSpinocerebellar ataxia-1

Identifiers

PMID40192808
PMCPMC11977071

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.