ArticleInsights into imaging2025
AI-based automatic estimation of single-kidney glomerular filtration rate and split renal function using non-contrast CT.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiomics and anaesthetic planning: Quantitative imaging as a new frontier in preoperative risk assessment.World journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Dual-center validation of a multi-sequence MRI radiomics nomogram for noninvasive assessment of renal fibrosis in chronic kidney disease.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Deep learning in renal ultrasound: applications, challenges, and future outlook.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo address SPECT's radioactivity, complexity, and costliness in measuring renal function, this study employs artificial intelligence (AI) with non-contrast CT to estimate single-kidney glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and split renal function (SRF).
methods245 patients with atrophic kidney or hydronephrosis were included from two centers (Training set: 128 patients from Center I; Test set: 117 patients from Center II). The renal parenchyma and hydronephrosis regions in non-contrast CT were automatically segmented by deep learning. Radiomic features were extracted and combined with clinical characteristics using multivariable linear regression (MLR) to obtain a radiomics-clinical-estimated GFR (rcGFR). The relative contribution of single-kidney rcGFR to overall rcGFR, the percent renal parenchymal volume, and the percent renal hydronephrosis volume were combined by MLR to generate the estimation of SRF (rcphSRF). The Pearson correlation coefficient (r), mean absolute error (MAE), and Lin's concordance coefficient (CCC) were calculated to evaluate the correlations, differences, and agreements between estimations and SPECT-based measurements, respectively.
resultsCompared to manual segmentation, deep learning-based automatic segmentation could reduce the average segmentation time by 434.6 times to 3.4 s. Compared to single-kidney GFR measured by SPECT, the rcGFR had a significant correlation of r = 0.75 (p < 0.001), MAE of 10.66 mL/min/1.73 m
conclusionsThe non-contrast CT and AI methods are feasible to estimate single-kidney GFR and SRF in patients with atrophic kidney or hydronephrosis. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: For patients with an atrophic kidney or hydronephrosis, non-contrast CT and artificial intelligence methods can be used to estimate single-kidney glomerular filtration rate and split renal function, which may minimize the radiation risk, enhance diagnostic efficiency, and reduce costs. KEY POINTS: Renal function can be assessed using non-contrast CT and AI. Estimated renal function significantly correlated with the SPECT-based measurements. The efficiency of renal function estimation can be refined by the proposed method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.