ReviewExperimental physiology2025
Cardiac output limits maximal oxygen consumption, but what limits maximal cardiac output?
Review in Experimental physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Peak oxygen uptake in older adults with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.GeroScience · 2026Pooled it
- Heavy strength training effects on physiological determinants of endurance cyclist performance: a systematic review with meta-analysis.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Pooled it
- Cardiorespiratory and Hematological Responses to High-Intensity Interval Training in Adolescent Girls With Overweight or Obesity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.European journal of sport science · 2026Trial
- Estimated exercise-induced maximal myocardial blood flow in untrained and endurance-trained men.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- Cardiac output and determinants.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Improvement of cardiac function by Ivabradine in a doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy murine model is associated with a normal renal angiotensin II type I receptor expression but not with a reduction in fibrosis.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Vagal Activity and Fat Oxidation Basal Correlates in Older Active Postmenopausal Women: A Cross-Sectional Study.Sports medicine - open · 2026Article
- Cardiorespiratory fitness in working adults undergoing rehabilitation: the role of lifestyle and body composition- a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Cardiac output limits maximal oxygen consumption, but what limits maximal cardiac output?Experimental physiology · 2025Review
- The unspecific control of cardiac output during exercise and in (patho-)physiology: Time to get more specific!Experimental physiology · 2025Article
- Aerobic training improves exercise capacity after traumatic brain injury in female, but not male, mice.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Maximal oxygen uptake/consumption is an important variable determining exercise performance. It is generally considered to be limited largely, but not exclusively, by maximal cardiac output (CO), which limits the ability of heart to pump oxygen-rich arterial blood to working muscles. Cardiac output is a product of heart rate and stroke volume, which is the amount of blood ejected from the heart by one heart beat. Exercise training, especially of the endurance type, can increase maximal CO substantially. A straightforward way for the heart to increase maximal CO would be to increase maximal heart rate, but this does not happen; instead, maximal heart rate tends to be reduced after training. This is because heart rate is the most important determinant of myocardial oxygen consumption, and ventricular filling and myocardial blood flow (MBF) would be compromised by further increases in heart rate, given that MBF is blunted by contractions and occurs principally during diastole. Myocardial oxygen extraction is already high at rest and is increased further in endurance-trained athletes, making their hearts even more dependent on increases in MBF. The trained heart therefore also shows reduced MBF, enhanced blood mean transit time and higher myocardial vascular resistance at rest and during submaximal exercise, although MBF reserve is not improved. It follows logically that MBF is an important determinant of myocardial performance, and it is proposed in this review that cardiac afferent sensory nerves might contribute to controlling and limiting heart rate, hence maximal CO, in order to protect the heart from ischaemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.