Evidence mapPaperPMID 40193294Full record

ReviewExperimental physiology2025

Cardiac output limits maximal oxygen consumption, but what limits maximal cardiac output?

Ilkka Heinonen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Cardiac output and determinants.Intensive care medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ilkka HeinonenTurku PET Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-8608-4839

Funding

Research Council of Finland 324243
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maximal oxygen uptake/consumption is an important variable determining exercise performance. It is generally considered to be limited largely, but not exclusively, by maximal cardiac output (CO), which limits the ability of heart to pump oxygen-rich arterial blood to working muscles. Cardiac output is a product of heart rate and stroke volume, which is the amount of blood ejected from the heart by one heart beat. Exercise training, especially of the endurance type, can increase maximal CO substantially. A straightforward way for the heart to increase maximal CO would be to increase maximal heart rate, but this does not happen; instead, maximal heart rate tends to be reduced after training. This is because heart rate is the most important determinant of myocardial oxygen consumption, and ventricular filling and myocardial blood flow (MBF) would be compromised by further increases in heart rate, given that MBF is blunted by contractions and occurs principally during diastole. Myocardial oxygen extraction is already high at rest and is increased further in endurance-trained athletes, making their hearts even more dependent on increases in MBF. The trained heart therefore also shows reduced MBF, enhanced blood mean transit time and higher myocardial vascular resistance at rest and during submaximal exercise, although MBF reserve is not improved. It follows logically that MBF is an important determinant of myocardial performance, and it is proposed in this review that cardiac afferent sensory nerves might contribute to controlling and limiting heart rate, hence maximal CO, in order to protect the heart from ischaemia.

Indexed as

Cardiac OutputExerciseOxygen ConsumptionAnimalsCoronary CirculationHeartHeart RateHumansStroke Volumeblood flowcardiac outputheartheart ratemaximal oxygen consumptionmyocardiumperformanceperfusionstroke volume

Identifiers

PMID40193294
PMCPMC12053887

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.