Observational studyMedicine2025
Impact of multidisciplinary collaborative jejunal nutrition care on nutritional status and quality of life in severely burned patients.
Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multidisciplinary Collaborative Nursing Management Improves Health Behaviors and Psychological Status in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Coronary Heart Disease.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To access the impact of multidisciplinary collaborative jejunal nutrition care on the nutritional status, pain level, wound healing, and quality of life in severely burned cases. A total of 120 cases with severe burns who visited our hospital from January 2021 to May 2023 were enrolled. Inclusion criteria: ① severe burn diagnosis; ② admission within 18 hours; ③ normal heart, liver, kidney, and cognitive function; ④ informed consent signed. Exclusion criteria: ① consumptive/metabolic diseases; ② malignant tumors; ③ midway death; ④ pregnant or lactating women. Patients were divided into 2 groups: control (n = 60) receiving parenteral nutrition and observation (n = 60) receiving multidisciplinary collaborative jejunal nutrition care. The latter included a multidisciplinary team (burns, endocrinology, cardiology, nephrology) and professionally trained caregivers. The jejunal nutrition care included the placement of a nasojejunal tube, individualized nutrition infusion protocols, close monitoring of vital signs, psychological counseling, and regular consultations with the multidisciplinary team. Outcomes assessed included hemoglobin, transferrin, albumin levels, pain (Visual Analogue Scale), wound healing, complications, SF-36 quality of life, and nursing satisfaction. After management, the observation group indicated significantly higher levels of hemoglobin (mean difference: 16.28 g/L, 95% CI: 12.5-20.1; Cohen d: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.7-2.3), transferrin (mean difference: 0.67 g/L, 95% CI: 0.5-0.9; Cohen d: 2.5, 95% CI: 2.1-3.0), and albumin (mean difference: 5.26 g/L, 95% CI: 4.2-6.3; Cohen d: 3.5, 95% CI: 3.0-4.0) compared to the control group (P < .05). The Visual Analogue Scale scores in the observation group were significantly lower (mean difference: 3.18 points, 95% CI: 2.8-3.5; Cohen d: 6.5, 95% CI: 5.9-7.2), and the wound healing time was significantly shorter (mean difference: 7.41 days, 95% CI: 4.5-10.3; Cohen d: 0.8, 95% CI: 0.6-1.0, P < .05). The observation group showed a lower complication rate (P = .02). Additionally, the observation group demonstrated significant improvements in SF-36 quality of life scores and higher nursing satisfaction (96.67% vs 80.00%, P = .0001). Multidisciplinary collaborative jejunal nutrition care effectively improves nutritional status, reduces pain, accelerates wound healing, and enhances quality of life and satisfaction in severely burned patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.