ArticleArchives of dermatological research2025
Causal relationship between rosacea and psychiatric disorders: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Skin-Brain-Exposome Axis in Stress-Sensitive Dermatoses: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- The exposomal imprint on rosacea: More than skin deep.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the causal association between rosacea and psychiatric disorders, including major depression disorder (MDD), anxiety disorder (AD), and panic disorder (PD). A bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was performed. The publicly released genome-wide association summary data (GWAS) of rosacea and psychiatric disorders was used in the MR analysis. The random-effects inverse variance weighted method (IVW) was applied as the primary method, and several other estimators were used as complementary methods. MR-Egger, MR-PRESSO, Cochran's Q, and leave-one-out were performed to evaluate sensitivity and robustness. The forward MR results suggested that genetically determined rosacea did not have a causal association with the three psychiatric disorders. In the reverse analysis, the MR analyses consistently showed non-significant causal effects of these psychiatric disorders on rosacea. These findings were robust across different analytical methods. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the consistency of the results and provided no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy or outliers. A validation analysis using different datasets for the exposures and the outcomes, supporting the initial MR analysis results. Overall, the study found no evidence of a bidirectional causal relationship between genetically predicted rosacea and three psychiatric disorders despite observational studies reporting an association between rosacea and psychiatric disorders. The causal effects between these diseases need further exploration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40195148What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.