Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40195402›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Federated learning with integrated attention multiscale model for brain tumor segmentation.

Sherly Alphonse, Fidal Mathew, K Dhanush, V Dinesh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sherly AlphonseSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, India. sherly.a@vit.ac.in.
Fidal MathewSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, India.
K DhanushSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, India.
V DineshSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain tumors are an extremely deadly condition and the growth of abnormal cells that have formed inside the brain causes the illness. According to studies, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a fundamental imaging method that is frequently used in medical diagnostics to identify, treat, and routinely check for brain cancers. These images include extremely private and delicate details regarding the brain health of the individuals and it must be treated with much care to ensure anonymity of patients. However, traditional brain tumor segmentation techniques usually rely on centralized data storage and analysis, which might result in privacy issues and violations. Federated learning offers a solution by enabling the cooperative development of brain tumor segmentation models without necessitating the transfer of raw patient data to a centralized location. All the data are held securely within their institution. A Reinforcement Learning-based Federated Averaging (RL-FedAvg) model is proposed that fuses the Federated Averaging (FedAvg) model with Reinforcement Learning (RL). To optimize the global model for image segmentation jobs as well as to govern the consumption of client resources, the model dynamically updates client hyperparameters upon real-time performance feedback. A Double Attention-based Multiscale Dense-U-Net model, known as mixed-fed-UNet, is proposed in the work that uses the RL-FedAvg algorithm. The proposed technique achieves 98.24% accuracy and 93.28% dice coefficient on BraTs 2020 dataset. While comparing the developed model with the other existing methods, the proposed methodology shows better performance.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsFederated LearningHumansFederated learningImagesMixed-FedUNetSegmentationUNet

Identifiers

PMID40195402
PMCPMC11976911

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.