Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40195403›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Metabolomic profiling in heart failure as a new tool for diagnosis and phenotyping.

Maria V Kozhevnikova, Yuri N Belenkov, Ksenia M Shestakova, Anton A Ageev, Pavel A Markin, Anastasiia V Kakotkina, Ekaterina O Korobkova, Natalia E Moskaleva, Ivan V Kuznetsov, Natalia V Khabarova and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Maria V KozhevnikovaHospital Therapy No. 1 Department, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Moscow, 119435, Russia. kozhevnikova-m@inbox.ru.
Yuri N BelenkovHospital Therapy No. 1 Department, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Moscow, 119435, Russia.
Ksenia M ShestakovaLaboratory of Pharmacokinetics and Metabolomic Analysis, Institute of Translational Medicine and Biotechnology, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Moscow, 119435, Russia.
Anton A AgeevHospital Therapy No. 1 Department, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Moscow, 119435, Russia.
Pavel A MarkinLaboratory of Pharmacokinetics and Metabolomic Analysis, Institute of Translational Medicine and Biotechnology, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Moscow, 119435, Russia.
Anastasiia V KakotkinaHospital Therapy No. 1 Department, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Moscow, 119435, Russia.
Ekaterina O KorobkovaHospital Therapy No. 1 Department, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Moscow, 119435, Russia.
Natalia E MoskalevaLaboratory of Pharmacokinetics and Metabolomic Analysis, Institute of Translational Medicine and Biotechnology, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Moscow, 119435, Russia.
Ivan V KuznetsovHospital Therapy No. 1 Department, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Moscow, 119435, Russia.
Natalia V KhabarovaHospital Therapy No. 1 Department, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Moscow, 119435, Russia.
Alexey V KukharenkoLaboratory of Pharmacokinetics and Metabolomic Analysis, Institute of Translational Medicine and Biotechnology, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Moscow, 119435, Russia.
Svetlana A AppolonovaLaboratory of Pharmacokinetics and Metabolomic Analysis, Institute of Translational Medicine and Biotechnology, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Moscow, 119435, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classifying heart failure (HF) by stages and ejection fraction (EF) remains a debated topic in cardiology. Metabolomic profiling (MP) offers a means to identify unique pathophysiological changes across different phenotypes, presenting a promising approach for the diagnosis and prognosis of HF, as well as for the development of targeted therapies. In our study, MP was performed on 408 HF patients (54.9% male). The mean ages of patients were 62 [53;68], 67 [65;74], 68 [61;72], and 69 [65;73] years for stages A, B, C, and D, respectively. This study demonstrates high accuracy in HF stage classification, distinguishing Stage A from Stage B with an AUC ROC of 0.91 and Stage B from Stage C with an AUC ROC of 0.97, by integrating chromatography-mass spectrometry data through multiparametric machine learning models. The observed metabolic similarities between HF with mildly reduced EF and HF with reduced EF phenotypes (AUC ROC 0.96) once again highlight the fundamental differences at the cellular and molecular levels between HF with preserved EF and HF with EF < 50%. Hierarchical clustering based on MP identified four distinct HF phenotypes and 26 key metabolites, including metabolites of tryptophan catabolism, glutamine, riboflavin, norepinephrine, serine, and long- and medium-chain acylcarnitines. The average follow-up period was 542.37 [16;1271] days. A downward change in the trajectory of EF [HR 3,008, 95% CI 1,035 to 8,743, p = 0,043] and metabolomic cluster 3 [HR 2,880; 95% CI 1,062 to 7,810, p = 0,0376] were associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality. MP can refine HF phenotyping and deepen the understanding of its underlying mechanisms. Metabolomic analysis illuminates the biochemical landscape of HF, aiding in its classification and suggesting new therapeutic pathways.

Indexed as

Heart FailureMetabolomeMetabolomicsAgedBiomarkersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhenotypePrognosisROC CurveStroke VolumeBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID40195403
PMCPMC11976976

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.