ArticleScientific reports2025
The MacqD deep-learning-based model for automatic detection of socially housed laboratory macaques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rethinking non-human primate models for emerging viral infections after COVID-19.Laboratory animal research · 2026Review
- A Smart-Alarm Detection and Deterrent System for Long-Tailed Macaque Intrusion in Human Residential Zones.Journal of medical primatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite advancements in video-based behaviour analysis and detection models for various species, existing methods are suboptimal to detect macaques in complex laboratory environments. To address this gap, we present MacqD, a modified Mask R-CNN model incorporating a SWIN transformer backbone for enhanced attention-based feature extraction. MacqD robustly detects macaques in their home-cage under challenging scenarios, including occlusions, glass reflections, and overexposure to light. To evaluate MacqD and compare its performance against pre-existing macaque detection models, we collected and analysed video frames from 20 caged rhesus macaques at Newcastle University, UK. Our results demonstrate MacqD's superiority, achieving a median F1-score of 99% for frames with a single macaque in the focal cage (surpassing the next-best model by 21%) and 90% for frames with two macaques. Generalisation tests on frames from a different set of macaques from the same animal facility yielded median F1-scores of 95% for frames with a single macaque (surpassing the next-best model by 15%) and 81% for frames with two macaques (surpassing the alternative approach by 39% ). Finally, MacqD was applied to videos of paired macaques from another facility and resulted in F1-score of 90%, reflecting its strong generalisation capacity. This study highlights MacqD's effectiveness in accurately detecting macaques across diverse settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.