Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40195802›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2025

Exploring Self-Report Dietary Assessment Tools Validated for Indigenous Populations Globally: A Scoping Review.

Melissa Kilburn, Yvonne Hornby-Turner, Dympna Leonard, Valda Wallace, Sarah G Russell, Rachel Quigley, Edward Strivens, Rebecca Evans

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Melissa KilburnCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University (JCU), Nguma-Bada Campus, Cairns, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8712-2494
Yvonne Hornby-TurnerCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University (JCU), Nguma-Bada Campus, Cairns, Queensland, Australia.
Dympna LeonardAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia.
Valda WallaceCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University (JCU), Nguma-Bada Campus, Cairns, Queensland, Australia.
Sarah G RussellCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University (JCU), Nguma-Bada Campus, Cairns, Queensland, Australia.
Rachel QuigleyCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University (JCU), Nguma-Bada Campus, Cairns, Queensland, Australia.
Edward StrivensCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University (JCU), Nguma-Bada Campus, Cairns, Queensland, Australia.
Rebecca EvansCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University (JCU), Nguma-Bada Campus, Cairns, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

issue addressedHealth promotion for Indigenous populations commonly centres around diet-mediated chronic diseases and is often evaluated with self-report (personal recall)-based tools. Accurate dietary assessment methods are crucial for the evaluation of these health promotion outcomes. Dietary assessment tools may require cultural, contextual and language adaptation, as well as validation within Indigenous populations to ensure efficacy and reliability. Due to the limited literature available for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, this review aimed to explore the range of self-report dietary assessment tools that have undergone validation or reliability testing for Indigenous adult populations globally and their adherence to gold-standard Indigenous research principles.

methodsThis scoping review was conducted as per the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) method. Seven electronic databases were searched with no date or language restrictions. Screening, data extraction and quality appraisal with a validated Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander research Quality Appraisal Tool (QAT) were undertaken by two reviewers, with a third reviewer engaged for resolving discrepancies.

resultsTwenty-five articles describing 31 instances of validity and reliability testing on 28 unique self-report dietary assessment tools were included in the review. Studies were predominantly conducted in the USA (n = 13), followed by Australia (n = 4), Canada (n = 3) and Greenland (n = 3). The most common method of validation was relative validity (n = 23). Tools were primarily interviewer-administered food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) validated against multiple 24-h dietary recalls. Tools commonly assessed energy, carbohydrate, fat and protein intake; however, they achieved varying strengths of correlation (r = 0-0.82). Tools were predominately paper-based; however, six studies validated a device-based tool; no web-browser app-based tools were validated in the included literature.

conclusionInterviewer-administered food frequency questionnaires are the most prevalent self-report dietary assessment method validated within Indigenous populations globally. Browser-based e-tools, which are portable and cost-effective, may hold promise for dietary assessment among Indigenous populations. The acceptability and validity of such tools for Indigenous population groups should be explored through future research. Tools validated to capture added sugar, sodium and food group intake may provide for more meaningful evaluation of health promotion programmes for Indigenous peoples. SO WHAT: Tools that have been validated for use with Indigenous peoples are essential for supporting a reliable and accurate evaluation of health promotion activities. Validating dietary assessment tools to adequately capture the predominant outcome measures targeted in nutritional health promotion strategies within Indigenous populations may contribute a more meaningful evaluation of health promotion programmes for Indigenous peoples.

Indexed as

DietDiet SurveysNutrition AssessmentSelf ReportAustraliaAustralian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesHumansReproducibility of ResultsAboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoplesdietary assessmentdietary intakedietary measurementindigenous peoplesvalidity and reliability

Identifiers

PMID40195802
PMCPMC11976195

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.