Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40196798›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2025

Association between neighbourhood food environment and dietary quality among adolescents in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Nurfarhana Norddin, Nik Norasma Che'Ya, Nur Adibah Mohidem, Nurzalinda Zalbahar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nurfarhana NorddinDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Nik Norasma Che'YaDepartment of Agriculture Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Nur Adibah MohidemPublic Health Unit, Department of Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Bandar Baru Nilai, 71800, Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia.
Nurzalinda ZalbaharDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neighbourhood food environment has been found to influence the dietary quality of adolescents. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the association between neighbourhood food environment and dietary quality among adolescents that come from low-income families in Kuala Lumpur. This cross-sectional study involves 184 adolescents from six public secondary schools in Kuala Lumpur. The online self-administered questionnaire through Google Forms was used to obtain information regarding adolescents' sociodemographic characteristics, dietary quality, and perceived availability, accessibility, and affordability of the neighbourhood food environment. Food stores and home addresses were geocoded using Google Earth. Geographic Information System (GIS) was used to identify the status of neighbourhood food environment, map the food stores and home addresses, and determine 1000m buffer zones around respondents' addresses. Associations between neighbourhood food environment statuses and dietary quality were examined using Pearson correlation, Chi-Square Test and Multivariable Linear Regression (MLR). The most reported response for dietary quality status is it 'requires improvement' (62.0 %), compared to having a 'poor diet' (23.9 %) and 'good' (14.1 %). The majority (60.3 %) resided in a healthy food environment, while the minority lived in food swamps (37.0 %) and food deserts (2.7 %). Although the majority of respondents perceived While a higher number of them perceived high food availability (76.6 %) and affordability (64.7 %) of healthy food stores in their neighbourhood, over half (51.7 %) reported low accessibility to these stores. About 33.2 % of them never use food delivery services, followed by at least once per month (31.5 %), once every two weeks (16.3 %), and once per week (19.0 %). Age (r

Indexed as

AdolescentDietary qualityGeographic information systemNeighbourhood food environment

Identifiers

PMID40196798
PMCPMC11947694

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.