ArticleDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2025
Comparison of the predictive value of 17 anthropometric in-dices for the prevalence of metabolic syndrome among Chinese residents: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMetabolic syndrome (MetS) is increasingly viewed as a pressing concern for public health globally. The objective of this study was to compare the predictive ability of 17 anthropometric indices for the risk of MetS in Chinese residents, to explore the differences in the predictive effect of the indices between different sexes, and to identify the optimal predictive indices of MetS for men and women.
methodsThis research utilized a cross-sectional study involving 5479 residents in Shandong Province, China. According to the subjects' working curve (ROC), TyG-WHtR, TyG-WC, METS-VF, CVAI, and LAP with the area under the curve (AUC) greater than 0.850 were included in the follow-up. To explore the associations between indices and the prevalence of MetS, three logistic regression models were employed. The dose-response relationship between the indices and the risk of MetS was performed by the Restricted cubic spline (RCS) curves.
resultsThe prevalence of MetS in this study is approximately 45.56%. The multivariate logistic regression showed the predictive capacity of the TyG-WC and METS-VF for MetS was superior in males, while only METS-VF in females. Furthermore, there is a non-linear relationship between MTES-VF and MetS risk both in men and women (non-linearity p < 0.001). The potential for the risk of MetS increased when the METS-VF exceeded 6.67 in males or 6.30 in females. In addition, in the male population, TyG-WC is non-linearly related to MetS risk (non-linear p < 0.001), and the risk of MetS may increase when TyG-WC is higher than 750.40.
conclusionsTyG-WC and METS-VF have a good predictive value for the risk of MetS in the Chinese male population, with TyG-WC being better than METS-VF. For females, METS-VF could be regarded as the most reliable indicator.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.