Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40197397›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2025

Early initiated noradrenaline versus fluid therapy for hypotension and shock in the emergency department (VASOSHOCK): a protocol for a pragmatic, multi-center, superiority, randomized controlled trial.

Lasse Paludan Bentsen, Thomas Strøm, Jakob Lundager Forberg, Gerhard Tiwald, Peter Biesenbach, Malik Kalmriz, Jens Henning Rasmussen, Nikolaj Raaber, Sören Möller, Mette Løkke and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05931601 (Early Initiated Vasopressor Therapy vs. Standard Care of Primarily Fluid Therapy in Hypotensive Patients in the Emergency Department - A Pragmatic, Multi-center, Superiority, Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05931601 phase3recruitingnot on this map

Early Initiated Vasopressor Therapy vs. Standard Care of Primarily Fluid Therapy in Hypotensive Patients in the Emergency Department - A Pragmatic, Multi-center, Superiority, Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorOdense University HospitalRan2023 to 2027Enrolled320ConditionsShock, Shock, Septic, Hypotension, Hypotension and ShockArmsNoradrenaline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Lasse Paludan BentsenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. lasse.paludan.bentsen@rsyd.dk.
Thomas StrømDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Jakob Lundager ForbergDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Helsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden.
Gerhard TiwaldEmergency Department, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.
Peter BiesenbachDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Malik KalmrizEmergency Department, Gødstrup Regional Hospital, Herning, Denmark.
Jens Henning RasmussenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nikolaj RaaberDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Sören MöllerDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Mette LøkkeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Gitte Boier TygesenEmergency Department, Gødstrup Regional Hospital, Herning, Denmark.
Hanne NygaardDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Josephine Hyldgaard BrokDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Julie Westergaard AndersenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Nikolett BajuszEmergency Department, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.
Mikkel BrabrandDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

Funding

Stig & Ragna Gorthons Stiftelse 2024-3057The Medicine Fund of The Danish Regions 1564684The PhD Fund of The Region of Southern Denmark 22/26271The Region of Southern Denmark and Region Zealand's Research Fund R38-A1621The Region of Southern Denmark and Region Zealand's Research Fund R42-A2047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShock is a condition with high mortality even with early intervention and treatment. Usual care for shock and hypotension in the Emergency Department (ED) is intravenous fluid resuscitation which can lead to fluid overload and other complications. When fluid therapy fails or risk of complications are high, the next treatment step is the use of vasopressors for stabilisation. Noradrenaline therapy for hypotension and shock are commonly used in ED's outside Scandinavia, but the evidence on the optimal initiation time is sparse. The lack of noradrenaline therapy in Scandinavia provides a unique environment to investigate the possible implications of early initiation. The aim of this trial is to investigate whether the use of early initiated noradrenaline compared to ED fluid therapy can improve blood pressure goals and by that, reduce the need for ICU admittance.

methodsThis protocol describes a pragmatic, multi-center, superiority randomized controlled trial, randomizing patients with hypotension to intervention or control. Eligible patients are ≥ 18-year-old who have received at least 500 ml intravenous fluids (including prehospital administration), and without suspected cardiogenic, haemorrhagic, anaphylactic, or neurogenic causes, or require direct ICU admittance due to non-hemodynamic severe organ failure. The intervention group receives noradrenaline initiated at 0.05 mcg/kg/min with a maximum of 0.15 mcg/kg/min through a peripheral venous catheter for up to 24 h. The control group receives usual care. Treatment is targeted for a systolic blood pressure ≥ 100 mmHg, a mean arterial pressure ≥ 65 mmHg or a clinician defined blood pressure target. We require a sample size of 320 patients to show a significant difference in proportion of patients achieving shock control within 90 min (primary endpoint). Key secondary outcomes include ICU free days alive within 30-days and 30-day all-cause mortality. DISCUSSION: Previous prospective randomized trials on early peripheral noradrenaline treatment for shock are sparse and are investigated in settings where noradrenaline use is already usual care. Since noradrenaline are not used as standard treatment for shock in Scandinavian EDs, this provides a unique opportunity not only to investigate the early initiation of noradrenaline for shock, but also comparing it directly to ED fluid only approach.

trial registrationEU CT ID 2023-504584-16-00. CLINICALTRIALS: gov NCT05931601. URL: https://classic. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ct2/show/NCT05931601.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalFluid TherapyHypotensionNorepinephrineShockVasoconstrictor AgentsEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicNorepinephrineVasoconstrictor AgentsEmergency departmentEmergency medicineFluid therapyHypotensionNoradrenalineNorepinephrineResuscitationShockVasopressor

Identifiers

PMID40197397
PMCPMC11978030

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.