ReviewInternational health2025
The state of wildfire and health research: emerging trends, challenges and gaps.
Review in International health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Burning issues: trends in newspaper coverage of wildfire events and health.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Public Health Impact of Wildfire Smoke Exposure: Analysis of Respiratory-Related Medicaid Claims in Wyoming.Cureus · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe increasing frequency and severity of wildfires, exacerbated by climate change, population growth and land use changes, have escalated public health risks. These events are associated with respiratory and cardiovascular diseases and adverse mental health outcomes. Vulnerable populations, including children, older people and those with pre-existing health conditions, face particularly high risks.
methodsThis study evaluates the existing literature on wildfire-related health impacts. Key variables include publication frequency, geographic distribution, collaborative networks and funding patterns.
resultsFindings reveal a concentration of research in high-income regions, particularly North America and Europe, with limited studies from wildfire-prone but under-represented areas such as Latin America, Oceania, Africa and the Caribbean. This geographical disparity restricts comprehensive understanding and effective public health responses to wildfire impacts. The analysis also underscores the need for interdisciplinary approaches.
conclusionsWildfires continue to pose significant global public health challenges. There is a critical need for more inclusive research efforts, enhanced international collaboration and a stronger focus on health-specific outcomes, especially in under-represented regions. Expanding research in these areas is essential to inform effective public health policies and interventions that address the health risks posed by wildfires worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.