Evidence mapPaperPMID 40197650Full record

ReviewInternational health2025

The state of wildfire and health research: emerging trends, challenges and gaps.

Ana Raquel Nunes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Burning issues: trends in newspaper coverage of wildfire events and health.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ana Raquel NunesWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3709-3760

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increasing frequency and severity of wildfires, exacerbated by climate change, population growth and land use changes, have escalated public health risks. These events are associated with respiratory and cardiovascular diseases and adverse mental health outcomes. Vulnerable populations, including children, older people and those with pre-existing health conditions, face particularly high risks.

methodsThis study evaluates the existing literature on wildfire-related health impacts. Key variables include publication frequency, geographic distribution, collaborative networks and funding patterns.

resultsFindings reveal a concentration of research in high-income regions, particularly North America and Europe, with limited studies from wildfire-prone but under-represented areas such as Latin America, Oceania, Africa and the Caribbean. This geographical disparity restricts comprehensive understanding and effective public health responses to wildfire impacts. The analysis also underscores the need for interdisciplinary approaches.

conclusionsWildfires continue to pose significant global public health challenges. There is a critical need for more inclusive research efforts, enhanced international collaboration and a stronger focus on health-specific outcomes, especially in under-represented regions. Expanding research in these areas is essential to inform effective public health policies and interventions that address the health risks posed by wildfires worldwide.

Indexed as

Public HealthWildfiresClimate ChangeGlobal HealthHumansbibliometric analysisexposurefuture directionshuman healthresearch trendswildfire

Identifiers

PMID40197650
PMCPMC12585580

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.