ArticleBioresources and bioprocessing2025
Integration of network pharmacology and experimental validation to explore the pharmacological mechanism of andrographolide against asthma.
Article in Bioresources and bioprocessing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Elucidating the beneficial effects of gut microbiota-derived metabolites in treating hepatocellular carcinoma: an integrated network pharmacology, molecular docking, and single-cell sequencing analysis.Bioresources and bioprocessing · 2026Article
- Leveraging network pharmacology in the treatment of asthma.ADMET & DMPK · 2026Review
- Network Pharmacology-Driven Sustainability: AI and Multi-Omics Synergy for Drug Discovery in Traditional Chinese Medicine.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Andrographolide (AG), one of the main active components of Andrographis paniculata (Burm.f.) Wall. ex Nees, has been proved to possess the pharmacological function of anti-inflammation in multiple disease including asthma. But the potential mechanism is still not clear. In this study, network pharmacology, molecular docking and experimental validation were utilized to explore the molecular mechanism of AG in the treatment of asthma. AG-related targets and asthma-related targets were screened by Swiss Target Prediction, DrugBank, STITCH, OMIM, Genecards and TTD databases. A protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was obtained through the STRING Database. The plug-in of "Network Analyzer" in Cytoscape 3.7.1 software was used to conduct the topological analysis. GO enrichment and KEGG pathway analysis were achieved by Metascape database and Bioinformatics platform. The target-pathway network was acquired by Cytoscape 3.7.1 software. The binding affinity between AG and the target genes was evaluated by Molecular docking with AutoDockTools 1.5.6. Flow cytometry was also used to verify the mechanism behind the treatment of asthma by AG, which was predicted in network pharmacology. In total, 38 targets were identified as potential targets of AG against asthma. The top 10 targets revealed by PPI are: IL-6, IL-1B, NFKB1, MMP9, CDK2, CREBBP, MAP2K1, JAK1, AR, PRKCA. GO and KEGG analysis showed that AG treatment of asthma mainly involved protein phosphorylation, peptidyl-serine phosphorylation, peptidyl-amino acid modification and other biological processes. The main signaling pathways are Th17 cell differentiation, JAK-STAT signaling pathway and PI3K-Akt signaling pathway. Molecular docking showed that AG has higher affinity with MMP9, PRKCA, JAK2, LTGAL and LRRK2. Flow cytometry showed that Th17 cell differentiation may be the potential target of AG in the treatment of asthma. This study successfully revealed the underlying target genes and mechanism involved in the treatment of asthma for AG, providing a reference and guidance for future mechanism research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.