ArticlePLOS global public health2025
A qualitative study on behavioral and social drivers of COVID-19 vaccine amongst refugees and migrants in Pakistan.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Racialized vulnerability and socioeconomic determinants of health among Afghan refugees in Pakistan.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Migrants and refugees are among the most disadvantaged populations, with limited evidence on the access and uptake of COVID-19 vaccination among them. Therefore this qualitative study explores the behavioral and social drivers of the COVID-19 vaccine among the refugee and migrant population in Pakistan through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with regular and irregular migrants and refugees residing in Pakistan. Key informant interviews were conducted with stakeholders responsible for overlooking the COVID-19 vaccination process. A total of 18 participants were interviewed to gather insights on COVID-19 vaccine access, uptake, and behaviours among migrants and refugees. Data was collection from June to July 2022, in Karachi, Hyderabad, and Quetta. All the interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, translated, and thematically analysed on Nvivo software. The study found that refugee and migrant communities in Pakistan faced significant challenges to COVID-19 vaccination uptake, with barriers including misconceptions about vaccine safety and efficacy, fears of side effects, and mistrust spread by religious leaders. Participants were refused vaccinations at many centers despite government directives allowing vaccines for those without Computerized National Identity Cards (CNIC). Limited outreach and awareness efforts from the government, fears of identification and deportation, long wait times at vaccination centers, and the absence of female vaccinators in communities with strict gender norms further hindered access. Many participants also reported being charged for vaccination leading to lower vaccine coverage. Despite these challenges, some individuals were motivated to vaccinate due to workplace requirements, peer influence, or personal health concerns. Facilitators included door-to-door vaccination campaigns and school vaccination mandates. Vaccination camps set up by NGOs and government agencies at border areas and migrant-rich districts facilitated access. The study suggests targeted strategies to improve vaccination coverage, including provision of identification documents to migrants, inclusion in policy, and enforcement of multilingual communication to improve healthcare access.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.