Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40199309›Full record

ReviewYearbook of medical informatics2024

Knowledge Representation and Management: 2023 Highlights and the Rise of Knowledge Graph Embeddings.

Jean Charlet, Licong Cui, Section Editors for the IMIA Yearbook Section on Knowledge Representation and Management

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Yearbook of medical informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jean CharletSorbonne Université, INSERM, Univ Sorbonne Paris Nord, LIMICS, Paris, France.
Licong CuiMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Section Editors for the IMIA Yearbook Section on Knowledge Representation and Management

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe aim to identify, select, and summarize the best papers published in 2023 for the Knowledge Representation and Management (KRM) section of the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) Yearbook.

methodsWe performed PubMed queries and adhered to the IMIA Yearbook guidelines for conducting biomedical informatics literature review to select the best papers in KRM published in 2023.

resultsOur search yielded a total of 1,666 publications from PubMed. From these, we identified 15 papers as potential candidates for the best papers, and three of them were finally selected as the best papers in the KRM section. The candidate best papers covered three main topics: knowledge graph, knowledge interoperability, and ontology. Notably, two of the three selected best papers explored the potential of knowledge graph embeddings for predicting intensive care unit readmissions and measuring disease distances, respectively.

conclusionsThe selection process for the best papers in the KRM section for 2023 showcased a wide spectrum of topics, with knowledge graph embeddings emerging as a promising area for supporting machine learning applications in biomedicine.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMedical InformaticsBiological OntologiesHealth Information InteroperabilityHumans

Identifiers

PMID40199309
PMCPMC12020553

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.