Evidence mapPaperPMID 40199355Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025

Pathogen-induced alterations in fine-scale movement behaviour predict impaired reproductive success.

Marius Grabow, Conny Landgraf, Juergen Niedballa, Carolin Scholz, Jan Pufelski, Ran Nathan, Sivan Toledo, Florian Jeltsch, Niels Blaum, Viktoriia Radchuk and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Marius GrabowTechnische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0702-9642
Conny LandgrafLeibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany.
Juergen NiedballaLeibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany.
Carolin ScholzLeibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2283-7437
Jan PufelskiUniversität Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0009-0005-7103-8094
Ran NathanEvolution, Ecology and Behavior, Movement Ecology Laboratory, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-5733-6715
Sivan ToledoTel Aviv University Blavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-9524-7115
Florian JeltschUniversität Potsdam, Potsdam, Brandenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4670-6469
Niels BlaumPlant Ecology and Nature Conservation, Universitat Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6807-5162
Viktoriia RadchukLeibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3072-0095
Ralph TiedemannUniversität Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2604-6336
Stephanie Kramer-SchadtLeibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9269-4446

Funding

DFG Research Training Group "BioMove"Minerva Center for Movement EcologyResearch Training Group "BioMove"
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pathogens play an important role in ecosystems and may impair fitness-enhancing activities such as foraging. However, the sublethal effects of pathogens on host movement behaviour and their subsequent impacts on reproductive success are poorly understood. In this study, we used high-resolution tracking to examine the movements of free-ranging European starlings (

Indexed as

Bird DiseasesReproductionStarlingsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalFemaleHost-Parasite InteractionsMaleMovementanimal movementhabitat selectionhost–pathogen dynamicsmovement ecologyparental carereproduction

Identifiers

PMID40199355
PMCPMC11978449

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.