Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40199746›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2025

Family perspectives and experiences on implementing telehealth in pediatric palliative care: a qualitative approach.

Lucia Peñarrubia-San-Florencio, Carlos Godoy Junior, Silvia Ricart, Sergi Navarro Vilarrubí, Cristina Ruiz-Herguido, Arnau Valls Esteve, Julia Meca-Santamaria, Joan Blanco-Blanco, Laura Lahuerta Valls

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lucia Peñarrubia-San-FlorencioPediatric Palliative Care Service, Sant Joan de Déu Hospital, Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2276-5050
Carlos Godoy JuniorErasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-0871-459X
Silvia RicartPediatric Palliative Care Service, Sant Joan de Déu Hospital, Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0651-8180
Sergi Navarro VilarrubíPediatric Palliative Care Service, Sant Joan de Déu Hospital, Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1009-8991
Cristina Ruiz-HerguidoInstitut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu (IRSJD), Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5133-3564
Arnau Valls EsteveInstitut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu (IRSJD), Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Julia Meca-SantamariaSant Joan de Déu Foundation, Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-3882-8127
Joan Blanco-BlancoFaculty of Nursing and Physiotherapy and GESEC, Universitat de Lleida, Lleida, Spain. joan.blanco@udl.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4868-2974
Laura Lahuerta VallsFaculty of Nursing and Physiotherapy and GESEC, Universitat de Lleida, Lleida, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7916-2317

Funding

Horizon 2020 101016902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telehealth is seen as a promising avenue to improve accessibility and quality of pediatric palliative care (PPC) yet engaging users with digital tools (DT) over the long term poses a challenge. Aligning telehealth initiatives with the actual needs and expectations of families is crucial for sustainable care models. To explore family perspectives and experiences with telehealth in PPC, focusing on their needs, perspectives, concerns, and hopes to refine digital care models. This research employed a qualitative methodology, gathering data through a combination of semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with primary caregivers (PCGs) of PPC patients. PCGs of children utilizing telehealth services in PPC contexts. Interviews with seven individuals and a focus group of eight revealed three main themes: the experience of engaging with a PPC service that utilizes telehealth, the transformative potential of telehealth within PPC, and the barriers and facilitators influencing its adoption. A key finding was the collective desire among PCGs for telehealth solutions that support a patient and family-centered, holistic care model that integrates various health services without compromising the humanized essence of care.

conclusionsFamilies are generally positive about integration of telehealth into PPC, emphasizing the need for telehealth models that maintain the core values of humanized care. Success depends on engaging end-users throughout development, implementing user-friendly technology that fits into family life, and focusing on customization for patients. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Telehealth has emerged as an innovative response to meet the increasing demand for highly specialized care in PPC. • Digital health solutions often face increasing abandonment rates over time. WHAT IS NEW: • Families caring for children with palliative needs are receptive to telehealth, identifying essential features for its long-term success. • They value the preservation of personal attention in care, emphasizing the importance of maintaining human connection alongside digital innovations.

Indexed as

FamilyPalliative CareTelemedicineAdolescentAdultCaregiversChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicMalePediatricsQualitative ResearchCaregiversPalliative medicinePatient-centered carePediatricsTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID40199746
PMCPMC11978708

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.