ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2025
Laboratory-based Biomarkers for Risk Prediction, Auxiliary Diagnosis and Post-operative Follow-up of Osteoporotic Fractures.
Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- MiR-642a-3p increases the risk of postmenopausal osteoporosis and fractures by targeting INO80.Hereditas · 2026Article
- Yishen Gushu formula exerts osteoprotective effects in OVX-Induced PMOP rats: role of ferroptosis Inhibition and iron metabolism correction.Hereditas · 2026Article
- Re-evaluating basophil count as a hematological indicator for bone density: a subgroup analysis from an East Asian population.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewOsteoporosis (OP) is characterized by degraded bone microstructure, loss of bone mass and increased risk of fragility fractures. Currently, T-score determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) measurements has been regarded as the gold standard for the diagnosis of osteoporosis. However, multiple factors have indicated that the T-score is insufficient to identify individuals with osteoporosis at a potentially high risk of fracture, or accurately detect those who require treatment, or continuously monitor the risk of re-fracture and clinical outcomes after treatment. This review covers publications in a range of ten years and comprehensively summarizes the studies in laboratory-based biomarkers for osteoporotic fractures (OF), aiming to provide physicians and surgeons with an update of clinical research in identification, verification and application of these tools, and to provide useful information for the design of future clinical studies. RECENT
findingsIt was found that bone formation markers (such as PINP, BGP, ECM1 and SOST), bone resorption markers (such as β-CTX, TRAcP5b, osteocalcin, RANKL, RANKL/OPG ratio, and t-PINP/β-CTX), hormonal biomarkers (such as IGF- 1, PTH, leptin, adiponectin and AMH), indicators of inflammation and oxidative stress (SII, IL- 6, LTL, FlOP_360, FlOP_400, and GGT), microRNAs (such as miR- 21, miR- 320a- 3p, miR- 491 - 5p, miR- 485 - 3p, miR- 19b- 1- 5p, miR- 203a, miR- 31 - 5p, miR- 502 - 3p, miR- 4739, miR- 497, miR- 19b, and miR- 107), other biomarkers (SAF-AGEs and glycine), adipocytokines (irisin and Omentin- 1), senescence biomarkers (RDW), and lncRNAs (MIAT) may be useful biomarkers for clinical practice. Further validation of these biomarkers and a better understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms may help in the development and application of these biomarkers for risk prediction of OF, differential diagnosis among OP, OF and healthy individuals, as well as post-operative monitoring of re-fracture risk and treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.