ArticleJournal of medical systems2025
Personalized Health Prediction AI Models Using Transfer Learning and Strategic Overfitting on Wearable Device Data.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable depressive symptoms screening via statistical reasoning-augmented large language models using wearable and environmental data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Beyond the diagnostic threshold: paradigm shift in laboratory medicine from passive reaction to predictive capability.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The increasing availability of wearable device data provides an opportunity for developing personalized models for health monitoring and condition prediction. Unlike conventional approaches that rely on pooled data from diverse individuals, our study explores the strategy of intentionally overfitting models to personal data and subsequently applying a transfer learning technique to refine performance for each user. We predicted Next-Day Condition (NDC) and Next-Day Emotion (NDC) while considering diverse features such as physical activity, sleep patterns, environmental context, and self-reported measures. Initial experiments showed that models trained at the sample level performed better on evaluation data but failed to generalize effectively during external validation. In contrast, our personalized learning approach, initiated with a pre-trained model, significantly enhanced accuracy within ten days of incremental user-specific training. Although generalization across the entire cohort diminished after individual tailoring, extended individualized training increased the overall predictive accuracy for each participant's personal data. The interpretation of feature importance using Shapley's additive explanations revealed substantial variability in the features influencing predictions across individuals, emphasizing the need for tailored health models. These findings highlight the potential of combining intentional overfitting and transfer learning in constructing high-performance user-specific predictive models from wearable data. Future research should expand the number of participants, extend the training period, and refine these methods to bolster personalized digital health solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40199790What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.