ReviewEndocrine2025
Tailoring TSH suppression in differentiated thyroid carcinoma: evidence, controversies, and future directions.
Review in Endocrine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improved adequacy of levothyroxine treatment in low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer using the 2025 ATA criteria: a multicenter real-world analysis of 1,016 patients.European thyroid journal · 2026Article
- Assessing vascular inflammation during continuous TSH suppression in differentiated thyroid cancer: a longitudinal [EJNMMI research · 2026Article
- Longitudinal Bone Density During TSH Suppression in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Paired PET/CT Analysis.Cancers · 2025Article
- Efficacy of postoperative thyroid-stimulating hormone inhibition therapy in differentiated thyroid cancer in China: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.Gland surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis review focus on the controversial benefits of thyroid hormone suppression therapy (THST) in differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) and its associated risks, highlighting the need for individualized strategies to optimize therapeutic outcomes and guide future research.
methodsA systematic literature search on TSH suppression in DTC over the past 10 years was conducted, prioritizing RCTs, large cohort studies, and non-inferiority trials, with additional references identified from retrieved articles.
resultsTailored postoperative TSH strategies should consider factors such as risk stratification, treatment modality, histologic subtype, and adverse effect risks. In this context, mechanistic studies offer potential insights that could inform personalized TSH management, though further validation is required. Clinical evidence on THST in DTC remains controversial, particularly for high-risk patients, where support for stringent TSH suppression (<0.1 mU/L) is limited. Data for intermediate-risk DTC are insufficient due to cohort heterogeneity, while TSH suppression in low-risk DTC is largely discouraged. The well-documented adverse effects of excessive THST, including cardiovascular complications and osteoporosis, further provide a strong rationale against its routine use. Additionally, achieving and maintaining target TSH levels in real-world practice remains challenging, underscoring the need for refined approaches.
conclusionCurrent evidence provides limited support for the TSH targets recommended by the 2015 ATA guidelines. Optimizing postoperative TSH management should account for individualized factors, including risk stratification, treatment modalities, histologic subtypes, and susceptibility to adverse effects. Future research should prioritize well-designed studies with clearly defined suppression levels and appropriate confounder adjustments, emphasizing personalized approaches to balance therapeutic benefits and adverse effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40199841What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.