ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning integration of multimodal data identifies key features of circulating NT-proBNP in people without cardiovascular diseases.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A quantitative CT perfusion-derived online dynamic nomogram for predicting hemorrhagic transformation after intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke.European journal of radiology open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) is important for diagnosing and predicting heart failure or many other diseases. However, few studies have comprehensively assessed the factors correlated with NT-proBNP levels in people with cardiovascular health. We used data from the 1999-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Machine learning was employed to assess 66 factors that associated with NT-proBNP levels, including demographic, anthropometric, lifestyle, biochemical, blood, metabolic, and disease characteristics. The predictive power of the model was assessed using five-fold cross-validation. The optimal features predicting NT-proBNP levels were identified using univariate and step-forward multivariate models. Weighted least squares regression (WLS) was applied for supplementary analysis. Finally, the relationship between the corresponding features and NT-proBNP was validated using weighted and adjusted generalized additive models (GAM). We included 12, 526 participants without cardiovascular diseases. In the univariate model, age exhibited the highest association with NT-proBNP levels (the coefficient of determination (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.