ArticleScientific reports2025
Systematic development and refinement of a user-centered evidence-based digital toolkit for supporting self-care in gestational diabetes mellitus.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Self-care practices among women with gestational diabetes in low-resource settings in Ghana: a phenomenological study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Digital Health-Based Peer Support Ecosystem for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Vietnam (VALID II Study): Multistakeholder Cocreation and Pilot Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Implementation of a Gestational Diabetes Virtual Care Clinic: A Before-After Comparative Study.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026Article
- The 5-C model of digital health accompaniment: empowering women through a gestational diabetes self-care intervention in Vietnam.Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a pregnancy complication affecting many women, requiring changes in behaviours, which command them to learn self-care practices shortly. Digital interventions have been developed to support women with GDM. However, they have often overlooked women's needs and characteristics and failed to frame self-care theories into their design. To address this issue, we adopted a mixed methods approach to develop and refine a user-centred, evidence-based digital Toolkit for supporting self-care in GDM, providing behavioural and educational content, particularly about nutrition. To inform the development and refinement of the Toolkit, we conducted a literature review, observed sixty-six nutrition appointments, interviewed eleven dietitians and seventeen patients, and held co-creation sessions with two dietitians, all of which were analysed using a deductive Thematic Analysis. To validate the Toolkit, we conducted a survey with seventeen healthcare professionals, which was analysed using descriptive statistics. The final version of the NUTRIA Toolkit consists of four main modules with thirty-eight artefacts, including behavioural tools to assist women in GDM management. Despite some limitations, this study robustly endorsed the development and refinement of a user-centred, evidence-based Toolkit for supporting self-care in GDM, aiming for future feasibility and trial testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.