Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40199985›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Effect of faecal microbial transplantation on clinical outcome, faecal microbiota and metabolome in dogs with chronic enteropathy refractory to diet.

C G Vecchiato, M C Sabetti, C H Sung, F Sportelli, C Delsante, C Pinna, M Alonzo, D Erba, J S Suchodolski, R Pilla and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

C G VecchiatoDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40064, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Italy. carla.vecchiato2@unibo.it.
M C SabettiDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Parma, 43100, Parma, Italy.
C H SungGastrointestinal Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, USA.
F SportelliDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40064, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Italy.
C DelsanteDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40064, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Italy.
C PinnaDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40064, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Italy.
M AlonzoAnicura Ospedale Veterinario I Portoni Rossi, 40069, Zola Predosa , Italy.
D ErbaAnicura Ospedale Veterinario I Portoni Rossi, 40069, Zola Predosa , Italy.
J S SuchodolskiGastrointestinal Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, USA.
R PillaGastrointestinal Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, USA.
M PietraDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40064, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Italy.
G BiagiDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40064, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Italy.
F ProcoliAnicura Ospedale Veterinario I Portoni Rossi, 40069, Zola Predosa , Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic enteropathy (CE) is a common complaint in canine gastroenterology. Recently, faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) gained attention as a treatment strategy. However, the efficacy and long-term impact of FMT is still unclear. Clinical index (CIBDAI), faecal microbiota and metabolome were monitored in 20 CE dogs refractory to diet before (T0) and 3 months (T3) after FMT. Further data were retrospectively collected up to 1-year after FMT. Significant improvements were observed in CIBDAI, Dysbiosis Index (DI), and primary (PBAs) and secondary (SBAs) faecal bile acids and propionate one month (T1) after FMT (CIBDAI (median and range): T0 5 (1-9) vs. T1 1 (0-5), p < 0.0001; DI (median and range): T0 -0.1 (-5.6 to 3.8) vs. T1 -2.1 (-5.7 to 4.7), p < 0.05; PBAs decreased by 57%, SBAa increased by 41%; propionate increased by 20%). According to CIBDAI, 17 dogs clinically improved up to T3, and 10 dogs remained clinically stable up to one year after FMT. Alpha- and beta-diversity of the faecal microbiota of CE dogs did not differ, neither before nor after FMT, from that of 17 healthy controls. The results highlight that CE dogs refractory to diet with mild clinical signs and dysbiosis may benefit long-term from treatment with FMT.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesFecal Microbiota TransplantationFecesIntestinal DiseasesMetabolomeAnimalsBile Acids and SaltsChronic DiseaseDietDogsDysbiosisFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMaleTreatment OutcomeBile Acids and Salts

Identifiers

PMID40199985
PMCPMC11978890

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.